Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-08.txt (details)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Mon, 24 June 2019 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3B2120464; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=ZobFJK4B; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Bymyjp2w
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5fzfyju-zZov; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8492120234; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994F12259B; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:58:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:58:52 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm3; bh=3o1ercrV89NyLCNORW1MT4I mhV68nNnS4NKaC2h3O7Y=; b=ZobFJK4ByPTvsLMDmYoLw5MxHxBSI/wzHKWF3nh IonVnLmPAJB80UeE+t5y/YEFn+TbrCj0gMZhvn/1AMNzVQ1ArL36rAIfy8dhX/yL 44rA9ol6cEwMydTXf5H20E0YPBEowUySZVvb4Tq35rZ+ZnOTbDFr7QfW+cLiUvro Sny5rmbc5rR7Po9mYcv9oXd5fxeQo/o2/xXY3KXeSYbbb9FE6qJa0g2c2rpMkwZr +ZTb4p/wjpjS19daAI2En60PzNQXOBqD5QV/4OLsLg1wUpHXmUHjr6hF4PSwqzwD SbFddLQAC3WV96LzAvNT8+uESJW5I023FtCmN1YGzxMHxvw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=3o1erc rV89NyLCNORW1MT4ImhV68nNnS4NKaC2h3O7Y=; b=Bymyjp2wPuLAuou907Is2w u6oktwzWYdaEWIVw3E+i1wz1G07FlKnGD15J/WZBH31rwxgZsRBy4qTyQp+9Bx8A BC6HaK9ZIT9PjT4G6VwIBUxnPiKpkYKJKhiZMjs8JtL3QczibZ+4ZNSONZQpaNdo I4HosirD2j34LjZEde9Uj/kXtM3nwTteDTagv7F1w1iMOa0htbEqF/pXfLVIfVO5 BINu8E1XGi2qtVJ1JA0j38eEXgKa1qqUtDTpSFvoFP3aMFH01kDHUVTrQeHtdtu3 UP8rjhtKzZ0sTwedR6KtFPYOPnnnICaRZHTNEOyJO9nojziN8KDfxPA/NthFHkNQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:jDkRXbaAk_JMo54KJfVZvJtQyGF8zyilvUtkuYGbZRX-nDitxFsCvg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddruddvgdduheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffktgggufffjgfvfhfosegrtdhmrehhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdekudenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:jDkRXanW4hIPzc1u8Lw8cCCqnDYQjw88XW-FUsW6ecEXEFEU6l3rJA> <xmx:jDkRXXel3HWtTJ7W36bMEMtKHIol4OkAD9XlIygFHnZQdG4-I_8wPQ> <xmx:jDkRXQsTJ136ss8EKhgRkSs98xjOZ8RzSrxii2lkHbXy88B5WZqYmA> <xmx:jDkRXQjlBRke-D48C6v7RGIMszEBpaIPb8Pe5IBZzYaUxL0ooYw4jg>
Received: from rtp-vpn4-1540.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.81]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 93529380076; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:58:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <313FB5BB-CE29-4AF5-9F1C-ACA01E5583EB@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9FE5CB29-692A-4C2A-965D-7180F7114034"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:58:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20190109152609.GG28515@kduck.mit.edu>
Cc: draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
References: <201901091434.x09EYtsE086115@givry.fdupont.fr> <20190109152609.GG28515@kduck.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/gMb5uRaDSf1fTRRLOWmcL1FIVWs>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-08.txt (details)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 20:59:07 -0000

Francis, thanks for your review. Ben, thanks for your response. I entered a DISCUSS ballot to ask a clarifying question.

Alissa

> On Jan 9, 2019, at 10:26 AM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>; wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 03:34:55PM +0100, Francis Dupont wrote:
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>;.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-08
>> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
>> Review Date: 2019-01-08
>> IETF LC End Date: 2019-01-08
>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>> 
>> Summary: Ready
>> 
>> Major issues: None
>> 
>> Minor issues: None
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> - section 2 page 2: please add RFC 8174 with RFC 2119
>>  (note this can (should?) be done by the RFC Editor)
>> 
>> - 7.3 page 10: I have a mixed feeling about the "must". As the problem
>> is real some could want a MUST but the attack is both an example (so
>> the defense too) and against a feature which is not the subjet of
>> the document. I have no good proposal so I leave this to the security
>> directorate.
> 
> This is a critical security consideration relating to the core 4462 key
> exchange mechanism that was omitted from that document's security
> considerations.  It may be most natural to treat this entire section as an
> Update to the security considerations of 4462 (and accordingly mention that
> update in the introduction), since we already have an Updates: relationship
> with 4462.
> 
> -Ben
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:Gen-art@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>