Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09

Christer, thanks for your review. Valery, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Dec 13, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review Date: 2019-12-13
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-12-25
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: The document is well-written, and almost ready for publication.
> However, I have a couple of minor comments that I would like the authors to
> address.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Q1:
> 
> The Security Considerations lists IKEv2/IPSec algorithms that are not
> considered quantum-resistant. However, that is not mentioned anywhere else. I
> think it would be good to mention that in the Abstract and/or Introduction.
> 
> Q2:
> 
> Section 3 says:
> 
>   "If the responder does not support this specification or does not have
>   any PPK configured, then it ignores the received notification and
>   continues with the IKEv2 protocol as normal."
> 
> I assume the ignoring of a non-supported notification and continuing with
> normal IKEv2 is part of the IKEv2 specification. If so, I suggest to say add
> something like:
> 
> ", as described in RFCXXXX."
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Q3:
> 
> The Security Considerations talk about the Grover's algorithm. Please add a
> reference.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art