Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-07

"Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F23B1A9107; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:54:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sEmyEeCXZgzZ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:54:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA1B61A9130; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:54:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2462; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1450310089; x=1451519689; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=9to/m/o2y4s3m+9Y53p5pXzhi0RQ5vlcufh2vzsqDyc=; b=Yv1t8afrm50bgIAbCTywWNlBFU3UJXBCcI7sekHFTbwiJLGpTIznKa0y 6FvAhq2hckXW/eQ14dhyEvRGLBYlDq4yDYbVqrQ8kra4gk0lPuB7DOZiK 9WBkITnjkQdCNg77/2FfFV/zfR6nhJ5rhinuTQskRJ+2nGZZWWQ1zJ/TP E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 841
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AJAwBz+XFW/5xdJa1egzpSbQa9bA6BY?= =?us-ascii?q?hcMhTA6AoEoOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENAEBAQMBAQEBawsFCwIBCBguJwslAgQOBQ6?= =?us-ascii?q?IGQgOviUBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEPBQSGVgGCDoJuiCaBGgWWfAGCb?= =?us-ascii?q?IFiaogPnRoBIAFDghEdFoFAcgWDYYEIAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,438,1444694400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="218909323"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Dec 2015 23:54:48 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (xch-rcd-017.cisco.com [173.37.102.27]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tBGNsmqP026377 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 23:54:48 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:54:48 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-016.cisco.com ([173.36.7.26]) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com ([173.36.7.26]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:54:48 -0600
From: "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-07
Thread-Index: AQHROF0lPdHnh6c6NU6SOgAzFVKx1A==
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 23:54:48 +0000
Message-ID: <2C111E2A-EB07-4A80-8AB3-3023E7CD63BF@cisco.com>
References: <08FE1449-1077-49CE-9E13-00A686EBCECC@cisco.com> <20151126124117.GA7265@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <62FF8F04-3DAE-4431-BA7A-E2DD97129AF5@cisco.com> <20151207183114.GA32349@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151207183114.GA32349@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.211.195]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_38DABB90-ED89-426C-934E-D8A5346DAFF4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/hTv7woDZKJJMqQtplSnXyFBrpgo>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 23:54:52 -0000

> On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:31 PM 12/7/15, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:55:46PM +0000,
> Ralph Droms (rdroms) <rdroms@cisco.com> wrote
> a message of 128 lines which said:
> 
>> Would you consider adding a little text somewhere to make it clear
>> that the Appendix is intended as a guide to implementors?
> 
> Done,
> <https://github.com/bortzmeyer/my-IETF-work/commit/b768c43ab0624ec9cc8361d221a27058b64b19a2>
> 
>> My recommendation to improve the document would be the inclusion of
>> another appendix, describing the algorithm to use if zone cuts are
>> known.
> 
> It already exists, this is the second paragraph of section 2. (The
> ideal case.)

For the inexperienced implementor, a little more detail might be useful.

> But I do not find useful to add more text: for a real resolver, the
> algorithm in appendix A suffices (it works if the zone cuts are known,
> see step 1).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art