Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-drip-arch-22

"Stuart W. Card" <stu.card@axenterprize.com> Wed, 11 May 2022 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <stu.card@axenterprize.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CDCC15EB32 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.956
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.956 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=axenterprize.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SG9zPkoi6W49 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B80CC159525 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id 126so1654570qkm.4 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=axenterprize.com; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=usQfXrCV3uQBTcYDw0l969Ru6nI4Nnvutl6R9x3k+Lc=; b=UOS2511btPJyg4oj1NP+6HZWbeHqevMGT5UZybs6G12buuBxLbDKp94igArOan5JnS S13DWCcR6u3ND2Bmeu/XA8lsBj/49GZy8IFvLV4RiedCWDjOSbwDruKMG/6MoNjst8j6 5AoFV0DulOafLey5wfxtyRSx7alCoNxbOZeDg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=usQfXrCV3uQBTcYDw0l969Ru6nI4Nnvutl6R9x3k+Lc=; b=Zw9+o74qmqCNruN7sfdI/dlQw9RxD38d8aU3kutgBO0ocGUx+N9AfZotgHUBWupl7o 3u92P70oDuVsI/ogfCCujQMR0aqRJVJV+PdE+Ost0ul4z9JZFUWuL1BhX+L+D7IssvzF MxJpn67dBFd7wTQsg0b9Pq2yd6Yfn+BToAeeoxByThfjW5EKwpDI7uuOoxTEtULLs6Fu zT59mbDKw+GmxDjWbf6vB8eMi5oHwcRILwRk35JWU3ZgwBckdprgSbwB5i7pZZ0CDyI+ 0h3Qq6ryYwafnG/NihVNIbWYnuAvPFmf6qFzFaRCnapMQ+iqEw3MEe4ujfLwVpIrXJzo n5kQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+JHBmXfu3XVdkUATWVZ+c6bLoNanj66/TC+4JtLrm1MX8Ylbh lDRK4b0W51d1/xxO47wRUDQE/g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0x+oIrB4eLhsd9ABytJgZSf1iOR6pY4mIofHjyaup6WmDC24wdEdPwf2IKWark+bkaMUwBQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:244c:b0:6a0:4d3d:9fa8 with SMTP id h12-20020a05620a244c00b006a04d3d9fa8mr16469195qkn.591.1652252252547; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.129.127] (ip-72-10-210-250.nwptny.ntcnet.net. [72.10.210.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bl34-20020a05620a1aa200b0069fc13ce1f3sm782651qkb.36.2022.05.10.23.57.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 May 2022 23:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <bf0f860f-9b8b-2ace-8361-788f956a060d@axenterprize.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 02:57:36 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-drip-arch.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, tm-rid@ietf.org
References: <164914606592.1399.13762429925814449718@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Stuart W. Card" <stu.card@axenterprize.com>
In-Reply-To: <164914606592.1399.13762429925814449718@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/hcvQI73lyinj5TE3TigLQG4iBjo>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-drip-arch-22
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 06:57:38 -0000

Thanks for the review! I was asked to respond to your question. I agree 
that GEN-7 and GEN-10 may be conspicuous by their absence from the 
architecture document.

In the initial context of Broadcast RID, GEN-7 (QoS) is a requirement 
primarily on implementations of UAS RID senders that requires no 
explicit architectural support. For example: CAAs may require a minimum 
rate at which RID information is refreshed; in any sender implementation 
intended for use in multiple jurisdictions (or on multiple classes of 
aircraft) with different rate requirements, this would thus need to be a 
configurable parameter; however it need not be remotely configurable, 
thus there is no need to specify a protocol or language for 
getting/setting the parameter value. As Network RID matures, GEN-7 may 
assume broader significance, but we don't want to embed any guesses as 
to that in the current architectural overview. GEN-10 (multicast) is 
even more Network RID specific, so likewise to be addressed in future 
DRIP documents.

Do you feel that the above information should be reflected explicitly in 
the architecture document?

On 4/5/2022 4:07 AM, Roni Even via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-drip-arch-??
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review Date: 2022-04-05
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-04-06
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary:
> The document is ready for publication as an informational RFC
>
> One question: I noticed that the document relates to RFC9153 requirements. I
> did not see gen-7 and gen-10 addressed .   Gen-7 QoS: DRIP MUST enable
> policy-based specification of performance and reliability parameters.
>
> Major issues:
>
> Minor issues:
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
>
>
-- 
-----------------------------------------
Stuart W. Card, PhD, Principal Engineer
AX Enterprize, LLC  www.axenterprize.com
4947 Commercial Drive, Yorkville NY 13495
592 Hangar Road, Rome NY 13441