Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 16 June 2016 07:14 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC0D12B02C for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0GDqH5X7ISHz for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243CD12B012 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676742CEF0; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:14:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lT1_b35jREE7; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:14:08 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D692CECE; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:14:07 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_295E1762-DF53-4F39-8ED9-60A382DC3764"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR05MB19859A204D0BEE5773AF0B32AE460@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:14:07 +0300
Message-Id: <7282EB6C-D62D-414A-9C3B-034383CDFA3F@piuha.net>
References: <BLUPR05MB19859A204D0BEE5773AF0B32AE460@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/hsu1pzkeiysr5_YGH7SoKPbd7Bo>
Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:14:10 -0000
Ron, Many thanks for you review. > > Major Issues: I think that we are ready for publication. Ok. > But can someone confirm that it is OK to update the registry from an INFORMATIONAL RFC? I think that it is, because the registry policy is: > > Standards Action for Standards Track documents, Specification Required for other documents Yes, I believe that is the case. Jari
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-… Jari Arkko
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-addi… Ronald Bonica