Return-Path: X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC0D12B02C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:14:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.326 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0GDqH5X7ISHz for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243CD12B012 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676742CEF0; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:14:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lT1_b35jREE7; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:14:08 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D692CECE; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:14:07 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_295E1762-DF53-4F39-8ED9-60A382DC3764"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2 From: Jari Arkko In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:14:07 +0300 Message-Id: <7282EB6C-D62D-414A-9C3B-034383CDFA3F@piuha.net> References: To: Ronald Bonica X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: Cc: IETF Gen-ART , "draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04.all@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04 X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:14:10 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_295E1762-DF53-4F39-8ED9-60A382DC3764 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Ron, Many thanks for you review. >=20 > Major Issues: I think that we are ready for publication. Ok. > But can someone confirm that it is OK to update the registry from an = INFORMATIONAL RFC? I think that it is, because the registry policy is: >=20 > Standards Action for Standards Track documents, Specification Required = for other documents Yes, I believe that is the case. Jari --Apple-Mail=_295E1762-DF53-4F39-8ED9-60A382DC3764 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXYlG/AAoJEM80gCTQU46qbZsP/iSM3TTMLJgi1ueKwZkoqlCl LlT/rwFAOAZ6QzugBaLY7VUynqoO4kBAtG7Oh5ohbefVirp9FRq449f3j8B9qX/C Xy50akSvhpKY1DwjJkdCy1iDHS0Mald0Ya4dC9V12SRXRfCuycLN5vNLPMgtwfps K/cl9O6HbPzp73SrRlpIJy96YTOwmJdkuhKWuzIWk8EIAWRWsMZOMArlCGv4lmLZ 54509nI7ye/UXIPZynIN3e+4crTv2ocvuk4OEibeZujX0GVW7Lf9Z0vXz6iCIun0 aHbUrKCLfjVvSQayP+5URhWc501mf1mL2wFzEyxbpSqhZHiedsOwX2bpQa0DsLRj 8ewF8S49uTRFFeOZMyOT8zlZwz6l10tjEZxKIOnHzhpbUVfllPsZ1teIyiMlRqDB 4oYXl1SV7UGwXtObgEim7MIDfN2+PhhXSwgwHYFEHaD9BUHHsFci9+vT2xXwhqeE kEVsW2lZbeCBU/xLk2DQ7+X1Zimr2Ii4hQP4yTBtwDY9BQV6mGp5G2OEwUoWBr9Z 12GEuLfVSw7o/E8BhVslg3yol2VjO/NI8chNsfim/oldlrqEIboPu6ebUMzqXWeJ JugfBdWSYcyXj3UVSjJJxkVXTWu3K9SdpGyOERMTXOPDO8wPT7fFJ/7rl4iZYZAt Mk1+lbXSFHsyk8dqCDlC =tnRs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_295E1762-DF53-4F39-8ED9-60A382DC3764--