[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20

Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 02 May 2019 13:43 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-ID: <155680462130.24668.6177272397106598337@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 06:43:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/iDkJ1mMEOhj1Z-W5gMXGgFQoziE>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20

Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Not Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2019-05-02
IETF LC End Date: 2019-05-15
IESG Telechat date: Unknown

Summary: Not Ready

Major Concerns:

See https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines.  The
Security Considerations section MUST follow the template provided on
that web page, and the guidelines require normative references to
[RFC5246] and [RFC6536], among others. These two RFCs do not appear
in the references.


Minor Concerns:

None


Nits:

The TOC contains several lines where the heading goes past the column
of page numbers.  Reformatting would make this much easier to read.

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-t… Russ Housley via Datatracker
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Xufeng Liu
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Alissa Cooper