[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-15
Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Thu, 13 December 2018 07:30 UTC
Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B46130DCC; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 23:30:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: idr@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.89.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154468622674.21337.6779624997213312596@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 23:30:26 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/iIOVsppEk29zXQ3xqp03O0CC_AM>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-15
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:30:27 -0000
Reviewer: Erik Kline Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-?? Reviewer: Erik Kline Review Date: 2018-12-12 IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-12 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Seems like a fairly straightforward detailing of TLVs the meanings of which are defined elsewhere. Major issues: [obvious] A primary normative reference is itself still a draft. I expect they'll get published together. Minor issues: None. Nits/editorial comments: Some wording on Section 3 could use some readability cleanup, perhaps. [1] "represent the state and resources availability" does not somehow scan well for me. "state and resource availability"? "state and availability of resources"? [2] "are assumed to have all the required security and authentication mechanism" also seems like it could read more smoothly. "are assumed to have implemented all require security and authentication mechanisms..."? I'm sure the editors will have better ideas.
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i… Erik Kline
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Erik Kline
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Alissa Cooper