Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-03
David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Thu, 02 January 2020 15:29 UTC
Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB9612012E; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:29:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xGgj3VIGL0yb; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37B5A1200F1; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id b8so39386539edx.7; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 07:29:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=clonSvWtHwCsQIrBKdjfoEJK2b9bdVlhSnXQ1DlFWjI=; b=Kp4xYS80nROiCYT/AocEDSJ+CrtyYbYAcnnYPvMe9OOYyAz7RSCucotgAtxlIugVcC QZkqPU8gRKCV69qYQHw86yiK5FI1E72daV4fILWzODJ7yTly8TUX4KnY9icNTV1WQnOT lXf29lptiBWvLNYsw3EPmVUSSOVQkbvs+h8huCeZMBwM13pMmzja6j7Kl4b0fFzfrvVc mdLnA578vhJtXVAYbZRPIDJliMe+hjQq8ExTJEQbpefMib1JhqMLp3xwthM3CvYmdlOa yd/7Z/IYIGFd9o03mHIe2droSlS/Z1OeKEfDhPKfT8cK+a3Wpfj2y1W+GOa1um3/V86P KToA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=clonSvWtHwCsQIrBKdjfoEJK2b9bdVlhSnXQ1DlFWjI=; b=sZtRa2D1/Q/lWXimQzIsKYWrzHpB+J+FAb4wKSR8oMp46dhM2OyiwKWqG7UNO4X75k oGouUyWophg82L+0+C62He1wlhY/xK4UlmKgq3jJ7/RNnZONm3gWDRTdNZYsbyYz0Ddf tSrkxn1VU2Vn6FboLM7Lswn0CSmvNhlfGOsI7ZZUo+gyFcDsk0DZTVnLtnyiuVqsKqwC Kg7TqFY9dBx9WQX2nF07eP03BAyF9A0T6xKfBgRhmhED3R8y6YJNktY4vwNeXo7TIaEv e8xHTNKc1+Ls/kUC5d6MMfu6IA9PieZl/ihVGan3R6jqH2U8TK9fXEKkjLGYXtseh9ka Y+kg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUMSR02lp0wYLtb1ozqlh2iDoAWUrlqruepc7KpqTY5ZOriX1q4 pd0+sbM77GLuJIFtSj/JwjlS70e4iKsVRXrc36Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzqcEGi3F43Bi0y1sVCvGyJ+GJDw5v8yhBBetH/ox31D9vj50TEA3FxEYrODIqcfbH4hTdhIh0OJ1t/FVl39+M=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8590:: with SMTP id v16mr73054410ejx.202.1577978975694; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 07:29:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157662824941.4998.12199831329321073078@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMTW_J8Yfy=Bss_5NqYN5dF+dZ2PPk-wHswtXy0yG4szMw6Bg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMTW_J8Yfy=Bss_5NqYN5dF+dZ2PPk-wHswtXy0yG4szMw6Bg@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 10:29:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CADaq8jciPWcG+MkYWaQWFDXHDC0FEwKoDdHhY68CNn46amGUyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Cc: "gen-art >> General area reviewing team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f3785059b29dc36"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/jHdJyHgOW3gGUxG6dJuuhYTxTvw>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:29:40 -0000
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:53 PM Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> wrote: > All: This email serves as the second half of the review of > draft-ietf-nsfv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-03. > > I reviewed pages 297 to the end of the document, mostly for editorial and > similar comments from a generalist point of view. > > The disposition remains the same as before ("Ready with Nits"). In > addition to the nits I outlined in my previous email (reproduced below), > here is one additional one: > > 1/ S18.51.1: What is the value of bracketing the code with <CODE BEGINS> > ... <CODE ENDS> in this, and the next section? Clearly, you have code in > the previous section, and later sections, without such bracketing. > Uniformity dictates that the code in these two sections be given the same > treatment as the code in previous sections. If, on the other hand, there > is some significance to such bracketing, it may be good to comment on such > a significance in S 18.51.1. > It's a mistake. Will delete. > > Thanks, > > - vijay > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 6:17 PM Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker < > noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > >> Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani >> Review result: Ready with Nits >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >> like any other last call comments. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> >> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-?? >> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani >> Review Date: 2019-12-17 >> IETF LC End Date: 2019-11-25 >> IESG Telechat date: 2019-12-19 >> >> I have reviewed about 1/2 of the I-D, up to Section 12 (page 297). I will >> review the remaining 1/2 before the telchat, but I suspect that given my >> very >> high level overview of the draft, my disposition will not change. >> >> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. In >> the >> portion of the draft I reviewed, there are some minor nits that can >> easily be >> fixed. >> >> Major issues: 0 >> >> Minor issues: 0 >> >> Nits/editorial comments: 4 ("Sn" means Section n): >> 1/ Appendix A: s/No correesponding explanation/No corresponding >> explanation/ >> 2/ S1: s/authoritative complete/authoritatively complete/ >> 3/ S1.7 (page 12): "associable" or "associated to" >> 4/ There are many long lines that go beyond 80 characters, see S1.9, the >> bullet >> that starts with “o Open files can be …”, Table 1, S4.2.1, etc. >> >> Thanks, >> >> - vijay >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> Gen-art@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art >> >
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-n… Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Vijay Gurbani
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… David Noveck
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… David Noveck
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Vijay Gurbani
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… David Noveck
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Vijay Gurbani