IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Thu, 14 May 2020 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEDC3A0D7A; Thu, 14 May 2020 14:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=VAo5SDek; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=HDvRuMri
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uutPU-4GiO6e; Thu, 14 May 2020 14:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 431313A0877; Thu, 14 May 2020 14:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14280; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1589492774; x=1590702374; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=xjuvq9D0MoJfzx+QNh3vLORzeXppXKiPu/i8L4dlZjE=; b=VAo5SDekIs4X81w/cTjfCcOL92z6pUPyxfaLQ0EwJLPFRtH7B8Yqj55h bsFntvcnV2HkS1ILNkbVcNuiAw9aA8faUAqaUGKJsJeBV589/QMRQi/oy FcDahu0lCnPI2n1nHBbnrr8q5j2mG+Rn27LUsKEQ5Mab3Ag5XNF1/z0h3 E=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:rROWZhPxuI8+LFF3RAQl6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEvKwx3lDMVITfrflDjrmev6PhXDkG5pCM+DAHfYdXXhAIwcMRg0Q7AcGDBEG6SZyibyEzEMlYElMw+Xa9PBtaHc//YxvZpXjhpTIXEw/0YAxyIOm9E4XOjsOxgua1/ZCbYwhBiDenJ71oKxDjpgTKvc5Qioxneas=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CVBQALu71e/5xdJa1mHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQGCB4ElLyQtB29YLyyEJYNGA41Ak1SEY4JSA1QLAQEBDAEBLQIEAQGERAIXgX4kOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhXEBAQEBAxIRChMBATcBDwIBCA4DBAEBKAMCAgIwFAkIAgQBDQUIGoMFgX5NAy4Bp3gCgTmIYXaBMoMBAQEFhVkYgg4JgTiCY4lfGoFBP4ERQ4IfLj6EUBUfgl4zgi2RWoYhinOQFAqCTZhRnUmQLJ04AgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFWcBWDJFAYDZBAg3KKHQE4dDcCBgEHAQEDCXyOSAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,392,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="751702956"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 14 May 2020 21:46:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04ELkDm3024479 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 May 2020 21:46:13 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 14 May 2020 16:46:13 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 14 May 2020 17:46:11 -0400
Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 14 May 2020 17:46:11 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bi6HV/4d3VFOsQiHaq0JRBBg2agfUnbbPcLQt0AwdLNVHhRlUv9bNfILT2hU2HOjJp0hhuOAb4ACdb5nI6E6wJ7ZebtmAh+zYylMBe+0EZFD2smnjGgDvtYooGziGTlZk7UyUxozpZRHlwF+7oSq1nHO8zMOMSTJXU82OmesIsTs012NH/X0PcqkFe6o7rH3ROCPDHhFd9rdOvnkwK7HGE/60t/32Y+N9lB2SPtFI0xxzJTJlJM36ELzQHQv9TzFFsdHcw8DxTyBdbckbZ5Wg8DSKrThzl/w0WBkweIQeZcmS4gthNjySL/+hSHthYae9WrYyaqGtSr+XtL49CHH3Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xjuvq9D0MoJfzx+QNh3vLORzeXppXKiPu/i8L4dlZjE=; b=PnHhi9J3b9bBauLHbyCJMgsuVimf5D/GqgOdX0VCsMNBGSag6xSlnuDo8C5+QfM/MQjx94HV1uImZn6kHuvdvg7vWZ5+aW8qXg7jwIo5qOs7C6KGI4Lpsk6gw+Q5PR0u04Q/83V/HQSsDQbKSMMpU+H67ocUlgkcJ/jgv0GuwdqNOYL3BEa/A+HazE8RPxUi6AlnC0dgdPsDC0xW/ZvnZLv9+EsJWf56skrYWEF/kCfY+9oGTd+M/lOAXAyNCpRKa6ycTJO4KY5sCeOxSDAgRSlnQJXLyN2ynvq1L4T5Vg4IPz5yURHbcgqKtJHP8F2jvZ731m92caQtaLdKoqwdcQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xjuvq9D0MoJfzx+QNh3vLORzeXppXKiPu/i8L4dlZjE=; b=HDvRuMriT0jRPaNlymvgN/bzeIXRY+2pD/JX0p22ebceTpXG5JEoE/XONcLdiY83xCIWDvU/+qIOaIjs7IkN4i/3oY/0KeLQX4R+pV6oYaldOwfSIuxAh6vpiqgCjH1WV7HxKHxpP1fCFF2fW7Q4nYLMfvCiGy/Omg5zuUosA8s=
Received: from MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:5b::15) by MW3PR11MB4571.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:59::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.24; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:46:10 +0000
Received: from MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c4d2:505c:a6bf:21a6]) by MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c4d2:505c:a6bf:21a6%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3000.022; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:46:10 +0000
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com>, Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13
Thread-Index: AQHWJ8k7oO1z/U9/ckeQP7PcRQnIMqioAQ6AgAAf7hA=
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 21:46:10 +0000
Message-ID: <MW3PR11MB46190C1652223F6EE5D81F3FC1BC0@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <158877512992.25308.14489968716385236242@ietfa.amsl.com> <5f206fd3-8918-9c1f-e403-8591c54acf83@cisco.com> <f11f10e9-7a4d-903c-726f-9e79c02410a5@dial.pipex.com> <DC25CF92-555B-4D7F-ABD9-4063416CA6AC@cisco.com> <CAMMESsyL9ODXrOgMRE7RX6B_NfQB9Q--Qu6cE4-siWLMbH1qEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsyL9ODXrOgMRE7RX6B_NfQB9Q--Qu6cE4-siWLMbH1qEg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2602:306:36ca:6640:406e:d217:fc24:2439]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e8012e57-4557-4e04-0c1d-08d7f8503763
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MW3PR11MB4571:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MW3PR11MB45713C086C411BA7AEE8C4D0C1BC0@MW3PR11MB4571.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 040359335D
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: QRwEui+bw/8e8bcaLr08DNkPOwABuG//tQsK+f/OIYpJ619D3lvEMOWEbC6k2BJuipNTjV1SvSG5as6dToI1Xd17tOv7HFioxvO+V/ELoAaa1RO293rWtkvn99xAnER2W6qjY55fDnZcZdaKENToHWX0J2CJW25F7clA/bgI/GI1SpnA3OJEG1cY4PiGtAdWJyvr96Y1OdoOA1IrsS8o010Gd5BY7RHZf0Koc5zIqzQNtTLgmOUW6UDeDgcM7BYnWBEDrQLAVoqN5jFvhTqVFlP6BJYPYmG+S0jswjjFfbb8c0KzCmHNRFBLFfO+c6Qkh9qOG81/KEe08qMpIHfLPttTue3SNN67TlSoOwKKM3QF9quxYDoC3KQGT8iWPXUpKUFBK4TXZFKbV+eWauyiyw8aiws8q9KDR5wpXByRylvlZRUIcp6Gc9YgbmVosGul
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(376002)(52536014)(66574014)(7696005)(71200400001)(86362001)(316002)(5660300002)(186003)(6506007)(53546011)(8676002)(2906002)(8936002)(9686003)(33656002)(76116006)(4326008)(66556008)(110136005)(478600001)(54906003)(66446008)(64756008)(66946007)(55016002)(66476007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MW3PR11MB46190C1652223F6EE5D81F3FC1BC0MW3PR11MB4619namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e8012e57-4557-4e04-0c1d-08d7f8503763
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 May 2020 21:46:10.4991 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: J7iNbWXSB5ks22OaE6biuty2IwSq/UV2fHbRtg94Zoe8kj+Q5PhmJBEwsi2OTNg8uPqQQnyuE7Z/9EpRjLbKWQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW3PR11MB4571
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/jLrVlTLjEFTvmja8z8ZZIpjnlWk>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 21:46:18 -0000

Elwyn’s comment was:

<snip>
I was trying to understand
why a router that satisfies the previous condition so that it is
legitimate for it to announce ELC with any IP address prefix might wish
to only announce it with some prefixes and not others.
<end snip>

The answer to that is clearly stated in the draft (emphasis added):

“If the router supports ELs on all of its interfaces, it SHOULD
   advertise the ELC with every local host prefix it advertises in OSPF.”


What is needed is to know whether traffic routed via a particular node can depend upon that node supporting EL.  That info is communicated by advertising ELC for the local host prefixes only.
No need to do so for other prefixes.

HTH

   Les


From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:46 PM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppsenak@cisco.com>; Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

Hi!

Yes, we cannot specify something that routers unaware of this specification should or shouldn’t do.

I believe that Elwyn’s point is this: *if a router supports this specification* then when would it not advertise the ELC?  IOW, the specification only obviously applies to implementations that support it — in that case I would think that if a router supports ELs on all of its interfaces then it would always advertise the ELC, right?


Thanks!

Alvaro.


On May 11, 2020 at 3:18:34 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) (acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>) wrote:
Note that the optionality of ERLD-MSD advertisements appears on
reflection to be a more serious issue than just an editorial nit.

So what would you suggest? There are existing implementations that support multipath forwarding entropy using MPLS entropy labels but do not signal that capability in OSPF. We can't have a document that retroactively mandates that they signal it. This wouldn't be backward compatible. How can you possibly see this as a serious issue?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email