Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06

[Thomas Fossati <[e-mail]>]

Hi Suresh, thanks for your review!

On 25/03/2021, 19:10, "Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-??
> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
> Review Date: 2021-03-23
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-03-22
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary:
>
> Major issues:
>
> Minor issues:
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> There are a few lines longer than 72 characters and this will fail the
> ID Nits check. I dug a bit deeper and found out some of these lines
> were in the CDDL in Appendix B. Here are the lines if that helps.
>
> % awk 'length($0)>72 { print length($0) $0}'
> draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06.txt 73Intended status: Standards Track
>                          D. López 76; RSASSA-PSS with SHA-256, MGF-1 with
> SHA-256, and a salt length of 32 bytes 76; RSASSA-PSS with SHA-384, MGF-1 with
> SHA-384, and a salt length of 48 bytes 76; RSASSA-PSS with SHA-512, MGF-1 with
> SHA-512, and a salt length of 64 bytes

The nit you spotted was also caught by Russ in his secdir review and is now
fixed in the editor copy:

https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/commit/cd642c54afecfbd0d37511a70bbd51cc31e4525e

cheers!





IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.