[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 07 January 2015 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A521A89A8 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 01:25:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yM-gF1Jf5lGO for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 01:25:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA6C1A89A7 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 01:25:40 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkgLAP/6rFTGmAcV/2dsb2JhbABcgkMhIiIwWAEDtAcMAQEBAQEBBgWQTYFAHwEJhXMCgQ5DAQEBAQEBfIQOAQEDEhtMEgEVBw5WJgEEDg0aiAoBDKUYnhABCgEBAQEBHIYEiUMgEYI0DEAdgRMFji6DQ4ZLMII+gimIBoM5IoNucIFEfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.07,713,1413259200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="99083565"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2015 04:25:39 -0500
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.14]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 07 Jan 2015 04:25:38 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.14]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:25:37 +0100
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01
Thread-Index: AdAqW+Q7zZQGUjm4Q62Q1+iYeCu1zg==
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 09:25:36 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C95FC89@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.45]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C95FC89AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/kG0wsVoVBQnrexNDls7cevz1P7E
Cc: "draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 09:25:43 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.



Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.



Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.



Document: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 1/7/2015

IETF LC End Date: 12/10/2014

IESG Telechat date: 1/8/2014



Summary: Ready with nits



This is a clear and straightforward document, which requires the client and server TLS implementations to not use the RC4 cipher suites, and lists in an appendix the cipher suites defined for TLS use RC4.

The document was not updated since my initial review, so the only nit I mentioned in that review is still to be fixed.





Major issues:



None



Minor issues:



None



Nits/editorial comments:



There is one nit easy to fix - bracketed references of the RFCs updated by this document. are used in the Abstract. These need to be replaced by textual references to the RFCs.