[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-murdock-nato-nid-02.txt

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 19 November 2014 12:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A261A01F9 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:01:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.493
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WRrwFPvIp4d9 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:01:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C7381A0180 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:01:10 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlIRAA6GbFTGmAcV/2dsb2JhbABagkgjIyE0WQS4HQwBAQEBAgYFkiiBPx8BCYdJAoEFFgEBAQEBAXELhAQBAQMSG0ELEgEVBw5WJgEEDgUIGogfAQyxHJwchScBCgEBAQEBHIY5ih4gEYI9D0QkgR4Fi1+EToIqhF6IXz2DGIMijlGDe20BgUeBAwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.07,416,1413259200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="92791268"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2014 07:01:08 -0500
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.13]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 19 Nov 2014 07:01:07 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 07:01:06 -0500
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-murdock-nato-nid-02.txt
Thread-Index: AdAD8H58U1pchu+BTuqgxzIH33IAYg==
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:01:05 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C9092ED@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C9092EDAZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/kJpyR3lrKca3Cf2Edg7OGaLatsk
Cc: "draft-murdock-nato-nid.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-murdock-nato-nid.all@tools.ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-murdock-nato-nid-02.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:01:14 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at



<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.



Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.



Document: draft-murdock-nato-nid-02.txt

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 11/19/14

IETF LC End Date: 11/19/14

IESG Telechat date: 11/25/14



Summary: Almost Ready



Major issues:



1.       The document does not expand the acronym NATO at the first occurrence. Moreover, in section 7 it mentions 'that a standards body, like NATO' which is misleading - as NATO is not a standards body. I suggest to use the full name in the title and abstract, expand the acronym at first occurrence and correct the text in Section 7.

2.       The abstract and introduction should make clear that this is a request made according to RFC 3406 for a formal URN space type, as described in Section 4.3 of RFC 3406.

3.       As per RFC 3406, section 4.3:



Ø     The proposed template

Ø     should be sent to the:

Ø

Ø        urn-nid@apps.ietf.org

Ø     mailing list to allow for a two week discussion period for clarifying

Ø     the expression of the registration information, before the IESG

Ø     reviews the document.

Ø



I could not find in the summary written by the AD shepherd an indication whether this review occurred.



Minor issues:



Nits/editorial comments: