Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06

[Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

thanks for your quick response. I have put this draft on the agenda of
the July 5th IESG telechat.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 19/06/2012 10:58 AM, Qin Wu wrote:
> Done, thank for your reminding.
> Diff:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-07
> 
> Regards!
> -Qin WU
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gonzalo Camarillo" <[e-mail]>
> To: "Qin Wu" <[e-mail]>
> Cc: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[e-mail]>; "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; "General Area Review Team" <[e-mail]>; "Shida Schubert" <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 3:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
> 
> 
>> Authors,
>>
>> at this point (the IETF LC is over), could you please revise the draft
>> in order to address Vijay's comment?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> On 01/06/2012 4:27 AM, Qin Wu wrote:
>>> Agree, Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards!
>>> -Qin
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[e-mail]>
>>> To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: "General Area Review Team" <[e-mail]>; "Shida Schubert" <[e-mail]>; "Gonzalo Camarillo" <[e-mail]>
>>> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 4:51 AM
>>> Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Vijay,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your review. I agree with your comment. It was actually
>>> one of the WGLC comments:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg00395.html
>>>
>>> This comment in particular seems to have fallen through the cracks.
>>> Thanks for catching it.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Charles
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 1:22 PM
>>>> To: [e-mail]
>>>> Cc: General Area Review Team; Charles Eckel (eckelcu); Shida Schubert;
>>>> Gonzalo Camarillo
>>>> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
>>>>
>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>>>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>>>
>>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>>>> you may receive.
>>>>
>>>> Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
>>>> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
>>>> Review Date: May-31-2012
>>>> IETF LC End Date: June-14-2012
>>>> IESG Telechat date: Not known
>>>>
>>>> Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard; it has one minor
>>>> comment that should be fixed before publication.
>>>>
>>>> Major: 0
>>>> Minor: 1
>>>> Nits: 0
>>>>
>>>> Minor:
>>>>
>>>> - In S6, the text says that "... the use of security mechanisms with
>>>>   RTP, as documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] SHOULD apply."
>>>>
>>>>   I am puzzled by the normative language here.  Won't it be more
>>> proper
>>>>   to simply say that "... the use of security mechanisms with RTP, as
>>>>   documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] apply."
>>>>
>>>>   The use of SHOULD seem to indicate that there are certain cases
>>>>   during measurement reporting where the security considerations do
>>> not
>>>>   apply.  Surely you do not mean that, do you?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> - vijay
>>>> --
>>>> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
>>>> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
>>>> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [e-mail]
>>>> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>>>
>>
>>