[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-09
Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Tue, 24 January 2017 18:13 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFBE1295CE; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:13:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.4
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148528159990.12590.4203267942543391577.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:13:19 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ky9kufSsw_fY95MGgksWXApCuz0>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq.all@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:13:20 -0000
Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Not Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-?? Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review Date: 2017-01-24 IETF LC End Date: None IESG Telechat date: 2017-02-02 Summary: This document is not ready for publication as a standards track RFC. [Reviewers note: It is quite possible that the problem listed below is my error. In that case, this should be considered as ready with minor issues.] Major issues: I can not find any record of an IETF last call for this document. I looked in the document history and the IETF discussion list. If I missed it, I apologize for being oblivious. Minor issues: Why is the example if section 4 (and others later on) described as "non-normative"? Is it incomplete? incorrect? An example is, by definition, not a full specification. The language seems designed to reduce the value of the example. I would recommend removing all the "non-normative" notes from the examples. They are clearly stated to be examples. Nits/editorial comments:
- [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-09 Joel Halpern