Re: [Gen-art] [Curdle] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2-14

Ron Frederick <ronf@timeheart.net> Mon, 15 February 2021 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ronf@timeheart.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9F13A1106 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:34:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=timeheart.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aVtD298aUZ_7 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:34:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1BD3A110F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id k22so4322010pll.6 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:34:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=timeheart.net; s=mail; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ji4bRKOwx+GIHGwp0XVFYyhQeCZuFQK30BSp/a8Jtn8=; b=YBRG3W0GfNa6thyjqjzgbo5hwmugHb6W2zP0VyDLC7xvM9kKHoBj3mqaaZ+3zwvXxT s7eAFYYstKgrHrB+bQnEriOCdyz5iKxTfwnqpPYLXTF8Z+QkAps4S9WiLOHfyV4DJgh+ 78dDYvXQxCNSJAzk60R/vJOKVzH2D1Nkh/nec=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ji4bRKOwx+GIHGwp0XVFYyhQeCZuFQK30BSp/a8Jtn8=; b=IyAEWDxGhWNvGfvkvOtr2vcdoavF9hvLkj+p9dGxZp01LeeEBQ/SufncmvvFxuMNZ4 nD+Xvf79luGl66n/nVjajb54FB4Bt/0koyE2PZq9UPBJV2CCR03iktjz0osHHqsXbFLx shOpGYIhMfNOnIRS11nfefypEdu7fm8t/o0tHvuHJim2Eea3q3DQyaAcc2FGOocqRW2R ed92PLWNlk+e1qWoQMX/dscrOKLHT+5nz9niujSBIyeKPTuOCJxjQFrtQ4d1khiY1QxT v2lvei9K+Wu4+RU67OkJ/kHJoRquIHmZ6d/ZCwjb19Myb76MNsfjrD/1ePkj86nywpCB tpYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Y++peLVpaOA3u2nEpNNzsAhUGwWjB1/lQaEq0Pw5oezFoYeSF 9NnwBkBU/nSH4mcBadxu96WUxg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJklbAi97gnR3V+PiN7r7RyKZCo+0Ar7v4bFY2eKiW1W47g8sZ8zzh9QrhbKg/Zq+wUeeBqw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f2ce:: with SMTP id gt14mr530321pjb.221.1613421276655; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from quad.timeheart.net ([74.93.13.193]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k10sm20149969pfk.0.2021.02.15.12.34.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Ron Frederick <ronf@timeheart.net>
In-Reply-To: <13529.1613415279@svl-bsdx-06.juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:34:34 -0800
Cc: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, last-call@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, Curdle Mailing List <curdle@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5693EC80-A600-4B00-8D22-9E6F52755328@timeheart.net>
References: <161338412196.6190.4594634347573267176@ietfa.amsl.com> <13529.1613415279@svl-bsdx-06.juniper.net>
To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/l-3kP1uqhran0q0H-TNv5EZ2W38>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Curdle] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2-14
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:34:40 -0000

Hi Mark,

A couple of minor issues with the recommended text (grammatical, not technical):

On Feb 15, 2021, at 10:54 AM, Mark D. Baushke <mdb=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Suggestion to the reviewer of replacement paragraphs before the table in
> section 4 "Summary Guidance for Key Exchange Method Names Implementations"
> 
>     [snip]
>    It is suggested that the MUST NOT key exchange method code be
>    removed from the any implementations using them.

This should be “from any” instead of “from the any”.

>    The Implement column is the current recommendations of this RFC. Key
>    Exchange Method Names are listed alphabetically. This is ordering is
>    not intended to be the order used in either the server or client
>    negotiation lists.

This should be “This ordering is” instead of “This is ordering is”.
-- 
Ron Frederick
ronf@timeheart.net