Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of RFC2818
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 08 June 2012 18:25 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7945C21F87CC for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.356
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.757, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RxZFSIVah3-j for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFA921F87CA for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty8 with SMTP id y8so2368457bkt.31 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QTBVcU0i6DTtWOUqGVkuHl6SiQVnzLA1a7MwDHW9KII=; b=JS2f6k7IpVjVEOO4nKXY2zAmeoItX+AyvE4OweZEx4ZYuJdjlJYPHTsR++m7iD1+Ig Lg9INnq+rhtfj/k7srro7XHGRhV46OpWVa2+y8uzORxYcOI8zhAVkYZs3RK8CYZ3RVW4 QHYjn8d9Ec5hJUH2LVpwjn/uwfu27McPMJFC+ngYMA6gUloKXCoIqL7jm2rER1i0C0LV AUr0cQaGmBT3Iyxq/NwxGAmSqBisQw6RKTPyoug+2E/tbrUmi3rBAio1H+n/tAMweGID JQJxN94tszvVOzO1PRaVSWBW1M9E559X6S2ZVQx2Idgap9lJz6ZKp4Y/9ql5nAIpYx3l aPJA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.205.33.136 with SMTP id so8mr6643518bkb.1.1339179928731; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.66.4 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FD1AAC6.1000308@gmail.com>
References: <4FD1AAC6.1000308@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:25:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU7k8shmbBQAZJ4TG1R6O9c8OYdeKOyP9=+M-c_gPW-UA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "Joseph A. Salowey" <jsalowey@cisco.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of RFC2818
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:25:30 -0000
On 8 June 2012 00:33, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > Please see attached review. I haven't cc'ed the IETF or IESG since > my comment is only a process issue, but this can be forwarded as you > think fit. If the IESG can see a way round it consistent with RFC 2026, > that would be fine by me. The "Updates" in RFC 5785 is an error, as noted in an erratum on that document.
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of RFC2818 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of RFC2818 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of RFC2818 Brian E Carpenter