Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 22 May 2018 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF47012EAE2; Tue, 22 May 2018 04:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=riNI3BTH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=IZyYIbAT
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlczbgY04ph1; Tue, 22 May 2018 04:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E95C126D73; Tue, 22 May 2018 04:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C266A21847; Tue, 22 May 2018 07:08:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 22 May 2018 07:08:47 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=pTo/xhj66m4bQVIVibpGDGsUzLvSW+0w3ksJS3xAZs0=; b=riNI3BTH 7OgmpK0Ny/ifuLRfWY/+uJRhn8q77+DAPiw5mhalV1nivzWbyYPj3Luv2WOCgYhb h9i7TPM+D6oucH7Wr4MJvg1ftXQEIIM/OHJ07E8G22AuiX6b7mPKR+bSlgXM/sux 2oZc6PWY1yZqfQOSSIaf7WOBPhHFpaF9q70BZkOJSh5k8r284Y34iEIp8uXGAWnW UoWy3C6BQJMAaxOHquNWW3nTI+0NiTYEZn+sPsT2Up+qs8i7yo3zDRMnFzPzQc09 HhAnb+MP96/hxu3tUKpUa4uAVLSIvgTxQh/6vW24z9hEjkJx6i+XSyLyb0A5rGpZ FQtmvb7JxWJY3w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=pTo/xhj66m4bQVIVibpGDGsUzLvSW +0w3ksJS3xAZs0=; b=IZyYIbAT+Os0a/c1yNJhKYmOXykH0amYPW3aobCCQEplt nO4whqhoVx43xCXkAj0dSZSGfcd7e2uVYC8xhIpKm2NfGxnK63fAb/yvzR6vRUar dn9orznw26ZQwe/juhnBLl/ufz35+A4/dVcnuGGJDArn26KLY1Fwly5E6CFlK4q/ cRgXzUuykFSLN5P7vsVsVJlVDRbestmlukBgUHB7xKv2M1Sm1jfO8jWK9ry94v90 vUh0WkDIvHZcdnkoFjkaYtHwkz/Z6Swut6TTptYK0m0m/iT2vEyAJmS6wusZOYeE wKSCBJcESBsVtcTLc342WY6RGSDitNbj6yAJ8vh7w==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:P_oDW3E8PrvoSgOMSevJqpU9JHXIA3E4t1P5fXo7UzHmvAbvw3IXUA>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:P_oDW4QBsPX3MAZPnpcGa5I6NhtCiNIPYSujd3VTHnuJmLIaYF5moA>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:P_oDW9vz854lIqTzkdhj67f9lXuMDKQUvfKYQXrtJHXop3G_kDYAKQ>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:P_oDW9Cff6jYrDvlbqOHE7nLo__GtSyLOGt8VFUy06nv7MQm7PxdJg>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:P_oDWydJjzDnF8wrQX73xqmbpYT46BnjZilTH_F6Wd8twqWQjsZJew>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:P_oDW9DGA5ww14jmJM1DpfjP2yCgY1flvbZ66T8B2Hi87qgjTjlhqw>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:P_oDW3OIxF_ZkVBPVih-kC-rlvVmP09T10JlwsJFfwPnsKVwHgMpAg>
Received: from rtp-vpn2-1620.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.84]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2F958E463E; Tue, 22 May 2018 07:08:47 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_01AAE2FC-4C12-4CB0-91C1-21FDE7479879"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <1008915678.319348.1525596124850@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 07:08:46 -0400
Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, Linda Dunbar <Linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, dime@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis.all@ietf.org
Message-Id: <EE9391C7-DC0E-4888-BB36-42BB0A02D000@cooperw.in>
References: <152538902971.11660.12472378818274345823@ietfa.amsl.com> <1008915678.319348.1525596124850@mail.yahoo.com>
To: Yuval Lifshitz <yuvalif@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/lJ1qtqSih12yWMJovUZQvWrxLdw>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 11:08:51 -0000

Linda, thanks for your review. Yuval, thanks for your response. I have entered a DISCUSS ballot to clarify a few things based on my own review.

Alissa

> On May 6, 2018, at 4:42 AM, Yuval Lifshitz <yuvalif@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Section 4 does not use normative language that dictates the *only* source for rating would be the CC-client. As the act of rating is done on the CC-server it may take into account other factors (for e.g. may fetch the subscriber's tier from an external system and use it together with service ID coming from the CC-Client to do the rating). However, if the rating input comes entirely from a different source (e.g. consumption of offline UDRs) then we cannot say that the above spec is implemented, as the concepts of online-charging is pivotal to the protocol between the CC-Client and CC-Server.
> 
> Yuval
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art