Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856E21A889D; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:03:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Km4mrFNsMsI8; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:03:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C369B1A888D; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:02:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-x229.google.com with SMTP id wq6so28051591pac.1; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:02:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+a4ktMtC8i7238eOVQPRvDI/vLyTi5VbJYRDead66pg=; b=cBS/YrYQFlSRSDGRPmq8kZ6IQTmtabNhswoGeuSLkxWCpVk8rCKnt8RdBUWQX3RuVd 3U9x+LfCAeQCA10hRbC8swOeoRAS6BrzV2H6o9m7o73G67EngesWrabmpH5Y4RD134lG r+5tHbnwScWGMo87y9e7HcyVDEcVLGGE4ucFIe/Cr6aZ9RVfVblxOab8ngG1z3itLmj6 cMVJTflJgJu9U8Achi5N7REOXPJ/XifXtESBxORgHVLRu504l1j/h3K2HOtvcHQnLV20 +FXPGfzcjgweXp2X8P1zm/9XYhaVFvyWWX8mvTQwEKmEAwHRooHRqeIdbZGeghGzZXhM Yybg==
X-Received: by 10.66.142.232 with SMTP id rz8mr65805643pab.74.1450292577430; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:02:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:7363:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:7363:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p83sm6430867pfi.96.2015.12.16.11.02.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:02:56 -0800 (PST)
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, "draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <5670C1B7.6010003@gmail.com> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D1D9E9E3F48@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <5671B564.6030401@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:03:00 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D1D9E9E3F48@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/lpiXDS9jJReJ7TnMYY88jyd9ncw>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:03:02 -0000

Hi Al, yes, that is much better IMHO.

Regards
   Brian

On 17/12/2015 01:48, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
> Thanks for your review, Brian.  I propose:
> 
>    We note that [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] proposes
>    a method similar to [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m], as ippm-list discussion
>    revealed.
> 
> hope that does it,
> Al
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:43 PM
>> To: draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive.all@ietf.org; General Area Review
>> Team
>> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>>
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04.txt
>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
>> Review Date: 2015-12-16
>> IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-24
>> IESG Telechat date:
>>
>> Summary: Almost ready
>> --------
>>
>> Minor Issue:
>> ------------
>>
>>    We note that [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] proposes
>>    a method similar to [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m], and ippm-list discussion
>>    indicates [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] may be
>>    covered by the same IPR as [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m].
>>
>> I suggest removing the IPR comment. It may be an issue, but not for this
>> draft. We generally avoid taking a position on IPR applicablity (in
>> fact,
>> our lawyer tells us not to do so).