Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Thu, 09 July 2020 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8893A0999; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 02:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id deIAT_MaXrN3; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 02:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92a.google.com (mail-ua1-x92a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F4AE3A0995; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 02:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92a.google.com with SMTP id k7so490829uan.13; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 02:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0+MLvmp5hqqU8S4irNLIflzCOWbaXZXKlBRHbGJqm7M=; b=t9nKKWKwWGkr484eOJ3pHrOh/1tCUT2dDra2xFULVEIn/ThDJ35vkTxg5rYGxp3OO9 M2ZXHsqKsIpSTedZdE9tdYDX3FmskJD6MyASqWyZnlabzglJB3/BpOMkcwjz35f3uOuA olT9igKvii7fMI0T6CPYSYS56HzNsY+W2pQzmkvs5UaL/0XJwL14Zs5LMxXs/hZRQ123 0SBKhqzZjR12hp29033bJmftYwBv02otDKo1mrimEEN8Blg4z7oP7+IQFqrzZhzKQJxa Styeb7hQop2VmM4/zTK5gaYZR4gVOemSzpttADFHVvMaselSSigVX0NZnYBDZbJ/1+aA FjpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0+MLvmp5hqqU8S4irNLIflzCOWbaXZXKlBRHbGJqm7M=; b=iBNuM2vwbpmBz59i/umEAYAcQQoEy8U7bVn4gGx5/qeqR85rkoG04ZEf/rYFxGjIqY ZgM/27xyxnaVkX3fNRFoTcWPDUPkChr1ddyVXKdT4ZbklI0z7SGMYkjpqmA8bxp7fuUu k2exJd43Xw5Cith88/nX+4b3s4S3A0Fucwg9L1lZ1cGFmvv5LluAhBab1fUUtK6NPvZc UkKzJbmOYW4C3eHqHnAP6VtOKfO0bYkA8sSULihhnjI+FUjHgAdcj7Bo+e8/6wWv7Yo5 h1ecZysJX7kU8s9X6yaNbQL1XN750xHmnlZibxyZgHWSkPZlYftXihBaxCndxSLZFpZu 7I6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qdBjn+NjEHQNjOUWoljgriqWNEHTutGAf+M+I2GCgUU8GT+lD 80cc5IT0Apj/F6+ZoeAPspr3ZsfMBZRTPxiPgvQzV6Cs
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz046/ssWc5DwdVAaNJqvdjRY7Savh6y9S8nTN+Xh+nC3dY7MDJx9CIvGjwHr1gM3Jwpfn8H5nRSks1vwIpY6k=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:217:: with SMTP id 23mr46117116uas.51.1594286471963; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 02:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159423577963.26106.8547442088755899406@ietfa.amsl.com> <3D6604F1-E541-473F-9D18-22D2A41A489C@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D6604F1-E541-473F-9D18-22D2A41A489C@vigilsec.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 12:20:41 +0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUcWGNRKuELTT9vFPpB_sHcYCTEtC=kdRx-K82nSZvUKnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d4ea0905a9febe04"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/m1in6xObGIr7Ba9iG6-RPuN6DIo>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 09:21:15 -0000

Hi Russ,

Thank you very much for your reply,

Best,

Ines

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:37 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> Ines:
>
> Thanks for the very carful review.  I'll tackle the ones about the ASN.1...
>
> 4- Appendix A: In id-aa-asymmDecryptKeyID OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {...}
>
> 4.1-   pkcs9(9) should be pkcs-9(9) ?
>
>
> Both are used in different modules.  They have become synonyms.  That
> said, we should pick one, and the use it in the two places where this is
> used.
>
> The hyphen is used in RFC 6268, where we import some things, so I suggest
> we use the hyphen here too.
>
>
> 4.2-   aa(2) should be id-aa(2) ?
>
>
> No.  This one is correct.
>
> Russ
>
>
>