Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc

Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net> Sun, 05 June 2016 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D20712D69C for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 18:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qOkPs00FhlVg for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 18:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D566912D50C for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 18:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by puck.nether.net (Postfix, from userid 507) id 9F222540CBC; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:16:03 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 21:16:03 -0400
From: Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Message-ID: <20160605011603.GB17675@puck.nether.net>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751E3F78@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751E3F78@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/m5X70sf4edssX6yLWAc87hfLuOo>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 01:16:05 -0000

On 16/05/16 12:48 +0000, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> 
> Summary:
> 
> The document is ready. It explains in a clear and detailed manner the operational experience in the design of large data centers using L3 only devices, Clos topology and BGP as routing protocol. I am not a routing expert, so I cannot validate all the statements made in the document, but the explanation seems clear and makes sense. The only comment I have is related to the lack of expansion of some of the acronyms (e.g. ASN, FIB ,etc.) - even if they are obvious for routing experts it would help to expand them at first occurrence.

Dan - thanks for the review, we tried to expand some of the acronymns in
the -11 version just posted.

-Jon