[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 13 February 2019 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62F1130E27; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 07:16:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: <gen-art@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dots-requirements.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.91.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <155007101476.9655.11486107409890423462@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 07:16:54 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/mDuKc2LHOsjCSQ6-qsG0iKR23is>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:16:55 -0000

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>;.

Document: draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2019-02-13
IETF LC End Date: 2018-11-23
IESG Telechat date: 2019-02-21

Summary: Ready, but with a process issue for the shepherd and AD to consider.

This version addressed all of my comments on version -16. Thank you.

However, the diff shows that a large number of SHOULDs were changed to MUSTs.
I'm guessing that was in response to a comment in the TSVART review of -16.
This large scale substitution makes me worry - are they really the right
adjustments? Has the group reviewed and agreed to these normative changes?

As a nit, I'll note that the additional description of heartbeating creeps into
specifying protocol rather than requirements.