Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Tue, 19 June 2012 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA7621F86D5 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlotcXVyrrno for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0372F21F86D4 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7fc66d000006fdc-aa-4fe02d6b3424
Received: from esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id C9.AA.28636.B6D20EF4; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:42:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.197] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.264.0; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:42:35 +0200
Message-ID: <4FE02D6A.6070101@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:42:34 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
References: <4FC7D2D2.9060008@bell-labs.com> <E1CBF4C7095A3D4CAAAEAD09FBB8E08C07386A45@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com> <A0778DDE5E0445E0AEAA5A21A523D53A@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <A0778DDE5E0445E0AEAA5A21A523D53A@china.huawei.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW627gN/g4PfNCwez13AarHgcqLF pllf2CyuvvrMYvH70DxWi4Y1cg5sHn2XXTym/N7I6tFy5C2rx5IlP5k8ei7NZvT4cvkzWwBb FJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAldG57ljLAWbxCpe7N7O2MA4X6iLkZNDQsBE4v2qTkYIW0ziwr31bF2M XBxCAqcYJVYtfcIC4axllPj95hY7SBWvgLbEj7e/wTpYBFQlOr7NYQOx2QQsJLbcus8CYosK BEvM677JAlEvKHFy5hMwW0RAXqJh811GkKHMAiuYJH7tXAY2SFjAS+LApIuMENuWMUr82rEV qIODg1PAQeL14lCI8yQl7rWvBlvGLKAnMeVqCyOELS+x/e0cZhBbCOi45c9aWCYwCs1CsnsW kpZZSFoWMDKvYhTOTczMSS831EstykwuLs7P0ytO3cQIjIiDW37r7mA8dU7kEKM0B4uSOC9X 0n5/IYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYxsO7ctTd/v4ScR6l2dVBLmJXr0SM3klQet F938H7XixHTl9x22/9f2cYc48Pc2nizNfHJNMoHjv1NS7hbOYNvsm8LVIrvuuiw+UPtawC5j QdjF/xa1F/b9WF/gMEPaqOHAj+Ur1l12LplTk1X2LkGVY9PBreeu5HqUxVv5BiY/vL7whvU0 KwclluKMREMt5qLiRAADvYvmVgIAAA==
Cc: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity@tools.ietf.org>, "Charles Eckel \(eckelcu\)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:42:41 -0000

Authors,

at this point (the IETF LC is over), could you please revise the draft
in order to address Vijay's comment?

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 01/06/2012 4:27 AM, Qin Wu wrote:
> Agree, Thanks!
> 
> Regards!
> -Qin
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
> To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>; <draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity@tools.ietf.org>
> Cc: "General Area Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>; "Shida Schubert" <shida@ntt-at.com>; "Gonzalo Camarillo" <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 4:51 AM
> Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
> 
> 
> Hi Vijay,
> 
> Thank you for your review. I agree with your comment. It was actually
> one of the WGLC comments:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg00395.html
> 
> This comment in particular seems to have fallen through the cracks.
> Thanks for catching it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Charles
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:vkg@bell-labs.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 1:22 PM
>> To: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity@tools.ietf.org
>> Cc: General Area Review Team; Charles Eckel (eckelcu); Shida Schubert;
>> Gonzalo Camarillo
>> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
>> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
>> Review Date: May-31-2012
>> IETF LC End Date: June-14-2012
>> IESG Telechat date: Not known
>>
>> Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard; it has one minor
>> comment that should be fixed before publication.
>>
>> Major: 0
>> Minor: 1
>> Nits: 0
>>
>> Minor:
>>
>> - In S6, the text says that "... the use of security mechanisms with
>>   RTP, as documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] SHOULD apply."
>>
>>   I am puzzled by the normative language here.  Won't it be more
> proper
>>   to simply say that "... the use of security mechanisms with RTP, as
>>   documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] apply."
>>
>>   The use of SHOULD seem to indicate that there are certain cases
>>   during measurement reporting where the security considerations do
> not
>>   apply.  Surely you do not mean that, do you?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - vijay
>> --
>> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
>> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
>> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
>> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>