IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 10 January 2018 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55290124207; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:53:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=H1L2Z1B0; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Yi4QWr+4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mYAgQScohneg; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4765E126DED; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7CC20AC5; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:53:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:53:08 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Y81pzhO7doiTh2lflNPnumZemureN 7Wke/9kaNI/20k=; b=H1L2Z1B09Y2s+tOQhW7CQnewILMFBaoapUNBi+MMiss6c tX2vO8U1aOKGXjxi4YpNBI156HXPwkXSM2LvzjTbs6z+tLo9s0rynL3l4wAnVf0b K3vUIRjoHKPSridr/nXv6X5Pa/bVfTSb5tkXYqapwTDjPo+5a5KjNA/K9ujj1hv0 6WhLJJoG0VF6EsEUrYxREgnzzmpyVikWtYDuKtxE71ou+q4AjxKRu+UsUvFolodG RLznVY+rhx893IIAgfJoS2EHYlzIkOuCtMq2AJxkP9aKXfYLy8+3TsnNFODcYlbd Isr7Fy9TlFBsqhK3x7DwjCQ70XwPjz8KSujo9Ec3Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Y81pzh O7doiTh2lflNPnumZemureN7Wke/9kaNI/20k=; b=Yi4QWr+4VOv5i0UX6Zzrlq khKP8hy8cQkgRrV7UfC9wC50eVC2HO+mJaEC0yoVmYeMLhRkLyNR0ahHc6OeoEfA UIc9dd3M6W09vMC8LtYatRZWcxjCk+7HPXO9Ah93NubjKocJV4x9zhN9iglJECR6 HEE8h+zyGGDBLNC2MCHomu+0xkeJ4rCDw/IU3nbbeIxoSjbZBNB+EMeGwZUjg0mk T2ZZjX4voiwc2uuuRAM5pstIBFNBErAYKZp5PrNl3gjo/eh1lsWwxKAideLS1gMY axF5GsT1XAFYJH6IW2JvcgeivutG9HY3fRTZOJca0Y/CXrTjk7zTeejppOi3hnmg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JG9WWoBqTCJwGBnnd38ER5HQlvPpa44aeR17US95yo4GPKBDnx7zjA>
Received: from sjc-alcoop-8812.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.179]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 85AAF7E4EE; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:53:07 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0201MB0867D027AF105F705E1A62A0F1080@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:53:05 -0500
Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp.all@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2424B915-77D1-4F5F-B614-02F124825C96@cooperw.in>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66AFDF7CD@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <BN3PR0201MB0867D027AF105F705E1A62A0F1080@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/n4LSkWksOEQ-JUrzj-rwjAy7isc>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:53:11 -0000

Linda, thanks for your review. Authors, thanks for your responses. I have entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Dec 15, 2017, at 10:02 PM, Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Linda,
> 
> Thanks for the review. We have added some descriptions as you suggested, and posted an updated version of the draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08.
> 
> Thanks,
> - Xufeng
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:linda.dunbar@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 6:25 PM
>> To: gen-art@ietf.org
>> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07
>> 
>> 
>> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
>> Review result: Ready with Nits/Comments
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
>> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the
>> IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07
>> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
>> Review Date: 2017-12-04
>> IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-12
>> IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-11
>> 
>> Summary:
>> 
>> Major issues: None
>> 
>> Minor issues: None
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments: It would be helpful to add description on why you need
>> both Tracking Interface and Tracking network. Both of them have the same
>> description "to detect interface connectivity failures".  What kind of
>> "connectivity failures" will be reported over the "Tracking Interface"? what
>> connectivity failures will be reported to "Tracking Network"?
>> 
>> Thanks, Linda Dunbar
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email