IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-01

Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> Sat, 02 July 2016 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <pal@sandflow.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D4B12D0CD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 13:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandflow-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iIJiZs9-JPaP for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 13:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com (mail-yw0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789AA12D1D2 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 13:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id i12so13659060ywa.1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 13:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandflow-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=APPH/f/F3P6gfh/k66gIiEgGBA4576Sg9nM2fi1ai58=; b=BjwJzuj1GH3czTIMhkS1+bFZIu9a48ogDAY0JQ8kjnC210zVA7/Wg57QA+WAfqbAWc 9VS56O7I2rxjRDnRAjxUKL0S1g9Ox/1UbQ+Vtd8ynvjiQp1tHY6XcmCjoA0uCo2Os6ZB gK1LQcMh/FKyg2OHkLD8tZAWLIxiziBsY17G8MQsuY/KbPXEHVe+/mfb4t3Zu4nYyk3r NRYr8ARZtNCNKy+iS8tnSMx7/bvdOzAWxcsjdIB+I1grmKcwZshDUdSubwvfA5R/Jm42 Pc7yE600xdWRGPnleL66AtdL/z0h196VA+qeUmaEa4F8hQx374RZx9Cu4YhLdTfzqwYU i8iw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=APPH/f/F3P6gfh/k66gIiEgGBA4576Sg9nM2fi1ai58=; b=BUI5zhHk7hO1yFIcX/hJBVPN08SzImoL5+pBxuG11zhFhll7Nj6OiqubuhkI0anNBF iBKlD1ptKqYaYf4RMLxUA+O8FOmBt/3Qwzn7FYjeHXsr9LHpIe4r9ehwtyNNBbt3PDdQ kBS9NH4eR925n8ZdlgdHuxRm53VKcK87P8wcQQ9WXOfK9X0i7rtT3Od4D/KZ5xmxXeeY P+iEnVEo84YfQMRZQhEQa9xXq50iJzmduwfH1Long9gdPJhY2HUwMgZu4yA0NTSq9l/Q oFXjcLCyjWThfWo21W1ZmIjvh+VDBu6voGpa47L6IDM0d37sAvHxQAbVDqZTsyJO70Ev 5OWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKZGvyAyD96QaFB2g+qzt+331lgs3ud9hWJGTim4KvDUqYXlbfZ+Mvu44j9tFlFMQ==
X-Received: by 10.129.83.131 with SMTP id h125mr1649766ywb.298.1467491454734; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 13:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com (mail-yw0-f179.google.com. [209.85.161.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 184sm9355836ywe.14.2016.07.02.13.30.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Jul 2016 13:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-f179.google.com with SMTP id i12so13658835ywa.1; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 13:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.129.41.11 with SMTP id p11mr2945561ywp.37.1467491453487; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 13:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.253.65 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 13:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5cfe1036-0ce0-8c52-6dc9-77cec5b3f1c0@bell-labs.com>
References: <5cfe1036-0ce0-8c52-6dc9-77cec5b3f1c0@bell-labs.com>
From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 13:30:34 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAF_7JxCLzzcDxL_Bu0o0azDAOirUshBvD-Y_wfi8V2c1LgsTcw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAF_7JxCLzzcDxL_Bu0o0azDAOirUshBvD-Y_wfi8V2c1LgsTcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/nETJ5MzxDm5jTGNA8DFYCQisbNA>
Cc: draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016.authors@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016.ad@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 20:30:59 -0000

Hi Vijay,

I appreciate the review and comment.

> That is, are the schemes (urn, eidr) part of the case-insensitive string match?

Yes, it looks like

"Lexical equivalence of EIDR-URN is defined by case-insensitive string match."

should say

"Lexical equivalence of URN-EIDR is defined by case-insensitive string match."

This would confirm that the entire URN-EIDR string defined in
"Declaration of syntactic structure" is considered for matching,
including "urn:eidr:".

In fact, it looks like all instances of "EIDR-URN" should be replaced
by "URN-EIDR" [ed.: this was missed in the original publication].

Does this make sense?

Best,

-- Pierre

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani <vkg@bell-labs.com> wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-01
> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
> Review Date: Jun-09-2016
> IETF LC End Date: Jul-01-2016
> IESG Telechat date: Jun-30-2016
>
> This document is ready as an Informational.
>
> Major: 0
> Minor: 1
> Nits: 0
>
> Minor:
>
> - S2, Rules for Lexical Equivalence.  I think some more guidance should
>  be provided here.  Specifically, are the following two EIDRs the same?
>
>   urn:eidr:10.5240:7791-8534-2C23-9030-8610-5
>   10.5240:7791-8534-2C23-9030-8610-5
>
>  That is, are the schemes (urn, eidr) part of the case-insensitive
>  string match?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@nokia.com
> Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email