Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-08

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 10 January 2019 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5C2130EF2; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 05:41:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=W6u8K+rU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Yz71nBgI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0v-RaGIHizri; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 05:41:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C619F130EC9; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 05:41:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC11121DE0; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:41:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:41:40 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm2; bh=O4GAzyHumPCSJUEz8zimi13 tWkR6RGC/90u3neS4YVw=; b=W6u8K+rUDWSblW8udPBd6lZn2IRnYeEh7qRtb9X 2NHni2Yfn/YbFhMnmMh+sbTyJ97AOdmE6aQU6k6I+ZbKsSBk61zd45l3VW8nMyQK 8qZomsqWoQZzs5kJlE2H/5QI+ibXTBdS/SveKZyPXRGH+1LJswEYgLoVG0Dt1Yif kWkV6pNSmMPrZCzvZxybzEjDUeqccTX1mAQUr7IoEeBQqrGimWLTtCtibsXBjUjZ 5Aw8f0EEnNY/FQLb8WclB621CQT3DjHKJ8nEoGR4IVYPIxM9XW9zdDgBl2aNuZ1J 7Egt28Vdbek7EihTUZLZFUTFdL8N0uJCUPYgnG+fi7RzrWg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=O4GAzy HumPCSJUEz8zimi13tWkR6RGC/90u3neS4YVw=; b=Yz71nBgIRiwk6VEE7ci6KF KMLOWcglj7T001dY+1DXQQvbePj4Kz3XKgqmTdDXUQf0rtm2cpKrm8LJKJVKjSEO hkv703TBMqDd+uMSl+TPRGMaAieldviUgMMUXi95rTJ4Jn8hcyZmOdek/QIwvVE5 OZEg5w9KA6+Pr05xzdB92pxVrv26oyfUAih5kYPUcS8HCGdyOXqduM41JFzQxGgm m87X4FB+wes7hm7RJAInZqkPk1KXub9oYtZlpGirG/9vVwg3s71FfXs4Vmyp8kJp tbY6ulHsQgBkAKUJnpp2ROFc6Vqx1McF50oHlWJDfcIBBQxmmU/1bxp7vhniCmNQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:lEs3XAyC3kkq-RRJigev01NY7U6NJqYXFF8N0D0cCCyCFBIwJMs0jQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrfeefgdehhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedt tdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffktgggufffjg fvfhfosegrtdhmrehhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhsrgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghl ihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenuc fkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghl ihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:lEs3XHwMZg6YjHsAUNOOOzYDSDF4Ag1SWui3Kn0pKIT5jV-xLogVkg> <xmx:lEs3XK1fDKFkKxe1ge4YVlw-EjsoYtZnP-J1Ey0d_jtZL-x9jYqh8w> <xmx:lEs3XBXHsLcTa4_hTyQPH5WXqMTT9YFTq01NWmJPxKBJv2C4dULJMg> <xmx:lEs3XCfD2QzKbOHbBgSibN7czcB8biOdhT-7WLiLxUR-kx4L_3fcfg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.84]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 47673100BB; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:41:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <A3C414C5-9664-4622-B631-2E87478ABE9A@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E98FCB14-5DFD-45FA-B531-E29ECF8B1971"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:41:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4UX2z0G86by6k_jHVdCgDOSjyLGho49DX4dwb==gNJMpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>, stephane.litkowski@orange.com
References: <154453856127.13107.13446099188672332015@ietfa.amsl.com> <9284_1545400013_5C1CEECD_9284_27_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B787B8F@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAFgnS4UX2z0G86by6k_jHVdCgDOSjyLGho49DX4dwb==gNJMpQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/nLt1QkHwmVLr43qo7c8g7SmRjcg>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:41:45 -0000

Dan, thank you for your review. Stephane, thank you for addressing Dan’s comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Dec 21, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> Hi Stephane, 
> 
> Draft 09 addresses my (minor) concerns. Thank you for the prompt response end for the edits. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 3:46 PM <stephane.litkowski@orange.com <mailto:stephane.litkowski@orange.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The -09 has been published and should address your comment.
> 
> Feel free to raise any additional concern.
> 
> Brgds,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:dromasca@gmail.com <mailto:dromasca@gmail.com>] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 15:29
> To: gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.all@ietf.org>; ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>; rtgwg@ietf.org <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>; dromasca@gmail.com <mailto:dromasca@gmail.com>
> Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-08
> 
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>;.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-08
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review Date: 2018-12-11
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-18
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> Ready
> 
> This document analyzes the impact of using non-standardized IGP Link State
> implementations resulting in non-consistent tuning of parameters in the network
> and increased possibility of creating micro-loops. It can be viewed as a
> problem statement for standardized solutions like RFC 8405.
> 
> The document is short and clear for implementers and operators familiar with
> networks running this class of protocols. Diagrams and table help in reading
> and understanding the material.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> none
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> none
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 1. In the introduction:
> 
> > For non standardized timers, implementations are free to implement it
>    in any way.
> 
> It is not obvious what 'it' means. I guess it's about different values of
> timers resulting in the possibility of micro-loops creation, but it would be
> better to clarify.
> 
> 2. It would be useful to provide short explanations that make the figures more
> clear. In fig. 1 - what do the nodes represent (routers implementing the
> protocols), in fig. 2, and 3 - the abbreviations on the y axis
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art