[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Tue, 13 November 2018 06:46 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154209157324.4186.13787008047570111006@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:46:13 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/nYcac6AOFBqSovSQhNY7HIaPfzM>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03

Reviewer: Erik Kline
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-??
Reviewer: Erik Kline
Review Date: 2018-11-12
IETF LC End Date: 2018-11-13
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Seems perfectly fine to me, though (per nit below) one or two examples
might help a reader unfamiliar with Frogans (such as myself).

URI vs IRI seems consistent with my current understanding.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: I can't help but wonder if an example or two wouldn't
round out the document.  But maybe leaptofrogans: URIs/IRIs aren't amenable to
constructing an example?

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-op3ft-… Erik Kline
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-op… Dale R. Worley
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-op… Erik Kline
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-op… Alissa Cooper
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-op… Benjamin PHISTER