Re: [Gen-art] [ipwave] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46
NABIL BENAMAR <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma> Tue, 18 June 2019 12:05 UTC
Return-Path: <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113E9120479 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=est-umi-ac-ma.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X2v-qpNjIotn for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 05:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C03011202B7 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 05:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id h6so29193962ioh.3 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 05:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=est-umi-ac-ma.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CrlB19rXW3bwEl+fDy5dv+Zz7d6liR0N7fmNs4UJHlg=; b=m2djzVhFLz3oIMbb1nyZH5ZpKZaPVP+TxsZE/l3IisD3QnIgtHS2r8zKuypm2t9VJw lEB354CDPManEYL5wB842fEUVQbnzeT9cwnlijpIuOGth5b7umhsfSyJW6np9GkNfOwc RuPkzX1Bqh4bTYD6syS4+y2CQt0PbXmQ1SrTKaDmLQWfLxDIiSOj67BqZAnU2+Oqk+9u KiNHFSkYMhp2Cv+tkXX91/TclyLfCULrnAyj/+RfLxbphjv73dWiaPpreq0ca8UMFl5l Yr7Ff/Cc194a3jVaVKPTjYdxmWopgt9iOafCqUWWNL2F8F8+ZtqmSsJv0TuTTenoOMPG USKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CrlB19rXW3bwEl+fDy5dv+Zz7d6liR0N7fmNs4UJHlg=; b=ZS9xIYODSQTN/XcMjjzFKV51G9kJgwAMRvwUwXb5G7Cz3tmFux3Vf7/uRoqj4sLEUW ZlzgQ9977IoVWI2sOVMUWZ17k7EiEwk0mYblqXY883OKKcPF/ZFnPIsDRmzZkDsPiPf1 ye8fQuuuZ/52BEge0WaAIHo85akrOvrSqAmYD7PVE4gxw2HQx+bpb28QtA11S+ffXBwU 1Z04BaQQgWTEgUCi77jZWZr0jKOEMqaFHsyJtmt+/2cSN7kn0rNAxROKtHNoBL7hvT92 4gjOBAfRmHgGXF0iu48GWQ9TdDfJ50Ng+EhSMzb/J30gEAqSyKsqFgmbG+NLyo8J+UAC R+NQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsmUL9EJ7r3TEAOaEYYqZP9pXHLsfEMUamavyjBoaxiJ3zQsLS LfhZQAphZ34qixgvILpLZzjaqmYOM4qSp96+dIzesA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz+vzkCFRBKbp64j5wn4Od6eNm3HCEpgIVQ4v88BXcvaobbesVYNwWar/Zt9+SZy7HRt61akOth/Wc7uPoGsag=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:2c8:: with SMTP id 191mr1978962ioc.191.1560859529673; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 05:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156067514313.12185.6559961431451739070@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAD8vqFcngv75CvQTSY1vnL1TsLWoFVtw8b_q6hvBRRdSMDZZsw@mail.gmail.com> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18D37579@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <9B1442B71BF74C83924B8C818D014A95@SRA6> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18D37922@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18D37922@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: NABIL BENAMAR <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:05:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD8vqFeo2L-=3LTqFBey0ECcN5GfavA207Ax8dNP-dTxmM8yyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
Cc: "dickroy@alum.mit.edu" <dickroy@alum.mit.edu>, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cf97f8058b97ed09"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/nqFVt_E0c35bP1f6OIkSJsUZfOs>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [ipwave] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:05:38 -0000
Thank you Roni, There was a privacy review of the draft and I think we have reflected all concerns. In MHO, the security review will be done as part of the process. On Tue, Jun 18, 2019, 11:40 Roni Even (A) <roni.even@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am not a security expert, I was just trying to reflect that when reading > the document I got the impression that privacy is a major concern since the > IP-OBU is moving and its location can be traced by sniffing the MAC > addresses. > > Maybe it will be good to have a security review of the document. I also noticed that there is support in IEEE SA - 1609.4-2016 for MAC address change. > > > > Roni Even > > > > *From:* Dick Roy [mailto:dickroy@alum.mit.edu] > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2019 10:48 PM > *To:* Roni Even (A); 'NABIL BENAMAR'; 'Roni Even' > *Cc:* gen-art@ietf.org; 'IETF Discussion'; its@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org > *Subject:* RE: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of > draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46 > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* its [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org <its-bounces@ietf.org>] *On > Behalf Of *Roni Even (A) > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2019 6:26 AM > *To:* NABIL BENAMAR; Roni Even > *Cc:* gen-art@ietf.org; IETF Discussion; its@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of > draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46 > > > > Thanks, > > The only comment left is: > > > 2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is changed on > the > 802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next sentence it > looks > to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be left > for > the unknown future. > > > > Should we reformulate here? > > > > I was expecting some recommendation since the changing of MAC address is > important to address privacy issues (discussed in section 5). Currently it > is left open with no recommendation , only saying that dynamic change of > MAC address is needed. > > Maybe the document should have some normative language for example in > section 5.1 that will say that IP-OBU MUST dynamic change their MAC > addresses > > *[RR] I highly recommend AGAINST this! There will be a number OBU and RSU > implementations that DO NOT require anonymity, and don’t want it either. > Furthermore, immutable identifier change must be coordinated with all other > interfaces and protocols otherwise changing them is useless.* > > > > Did the document go through security area review? > > *[RR] If it did, and the above was not mentioned, then something was > missed.* > > > > Roni > > > > > > *From:* Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org > <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>] *On Behalf Of *NABIL BENAMAR > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2019 12:48 PM > *To:* Roni Even > *Cc:* gen-art@ietf.org; IETF Discussion; its@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of > draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46 > > > > Dear Roni, > > > > Thank you for your review. > > Please, see my answers below. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019, 09:52 Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> > wrote: > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2019-06-16 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-26 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > The document is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > 1. Section 4.2 says "IP packets MUST be transmitted over 802.11-OCB media > as > QoS Data" while appendix F say "The STA may send data frames of subtype > Data, > Null, QoS Data, and > QoS Null. > > > > I will update the appendix to reflect the text in section 4.2. > > > 2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is changed on > the > 802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next sentence it > looks > to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be left > for > the unknown future. > > > > Should we reformulate here? > > > 3. In Appendix I 4th paragraph " However, this does not apply if TBD TBD > TBD. " > .. What are the TBDs? > > > > The whole sentence will be removed. > > > Nits/editorial comments: > 1. In appendix I last paragraph "Support of RFC 8505 is may be implemented > on > OCB." should be "Support of RFC 8505 may be implemented on OCB." 2. In > Appendix > I "OCB nodes that support RFC 8505 would support the 6LN operation in > order to > act as a host". I think that instead of "would" it should be "should" > also if > this is a recommendation why not have this paragraph not in an appendix > with > "MAY" and "SHOULD > > > > > > Agreed. > > > >
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i… Roni Even via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… NABIL BENAMAR
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… NABIL BENAMAR
- Re: [Gen-art] [ipwave] Genart last call review of… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [Gen-art] [ipwave] Genart last call review of… NABIL BENAMAR
- Re: [Gen-art] [ipwave] Genart last call review of… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [Gen-art] [ipwave] Genart last call review of… Brian E Carpenter