Re: [Gen-art] Telechat reviews

Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net> Tue, 26 April 2011 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@estacado.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B69E07E8 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yo3RHWcz7bh4 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from estacado.net (estacado-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:266::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B71E07BF for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.6] (cpe-76-183-178-106.tx.res.rr.com [76.183.178.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by estacado.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3QFONsP005227 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:24:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@estacado.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DB6E28D.7030607@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:24:22 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <89AADDC6-E684-4B38-8263-50675D753FDC@estacado.net>
References: <4DB5F34F.1000705@ericsson.com> <4DB6E28D.7030607@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Telechat reviews
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:24:31 -0000

I don't know if it is "policy", but I typically do not send anything if the document has not been updated, unless it is warranted by something else, such as discussions with the authors.

On Apr 26, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> Dear Gen-Art members,
> As I am new to Gen-Art, I would like to have a clarification on what is expected from me if I've done IETF LC reviews and reported "ready with nits". Am I still expected to send another message to editors/shepherd saying that drafts weren't revised and nits still remain, or can I just skip that?
> 
> Thanks,
> Alexey
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art