[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-13

Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 28 March 2018 05:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A960126DC2; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 22:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: <gen-art@ietf.org>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-senml.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.76.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152221578820.29905.10455247933119493699@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 22:43:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/oeQkQZx9dfZoB18jHw0EseFqcMg>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-13
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 05:43:08 -0000

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-core-senml-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2018-03-27
IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-30
IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-19

The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

1. in section 5.1.6 "another devices" should be "other devices" or "another
device" 2. in section 8  "It can simply hard code the output replacing the
1-wire device ID starting at byte 0x20 and going to byte 0x2F with it's device
ID". I think that the offset ix 0x10 to 0x1f