Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06

Jordi Palet Martínez <jordi.palet@theipv6company.com> Thu, 04 July 2019 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=10883bdbf9=jordi.palet@theipv6company.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5580120033; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 06:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=theipv6company.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KAzbqfPB-gry; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 06:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA7A120224; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 06:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=theipv6company.com; s=MDaemon; t=1562248360; x=1562853160; i=jordi.palet@theipv6company.com; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References: In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type; bh=7F0mmy1wJj4G7La8HUVC0x eegaHtV+XCZZOOQKfXx28=; b=KGhTNDZWxXBJ/LZ0tzjkCMxepARt2H5Jo3yC5f GV4+H8bOjN0dYWfj6vSegJbDHEg6HokTaAq7POs5JeUAk29O90qWYHlKxsTdl/e6 Ow/IYPf0g2V/e0QGiDNyEsATGB9X6LZ95rtxxt3NiYFNdJSTEwOSBZF8bhj+09YW Tpa3M=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: consulintel.es, Thu, 04 Jul 2019 15:52:40 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: consulintel.es, Thu, 04 Jul 2019 15:52:40 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.139] by consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50006315474.msg; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 15:52:39 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:fc55:9c63:59af:b7ec
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.139]
X-MDArrival-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 15:52:39 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@theipv6company.com
X-Return-Path: prvs=10883bdbf9=jordi.palet@theipv6company.com
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@theipv6company.com
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.b.190609
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 15:52:37 +0200
From: Jordi Palet Martínez <jordi.palet@theipv6company.com>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment.all@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <93D73696-1365-472F-B23E-7E78CFD2F610@theipv6company.com>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06
References: <5B0EBAA1-973B-4ED1-AE7D-F9E44D28F48E@ericsson.com> <5BB2877D-8D93-4547-93F2-44B7B7B4B997@theipv6company.com>
In-Reply-To: <5BB2877D-8D93-4547-93F2-44B7B7B4B997@theipv6company.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3645100357_1684805685"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/opAHiB8jW2hoHtbzFqlzF14CauM>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 13:52:48 -0000

Hi Meral,

 

I just realized, if I understood correctly, that from GENART the review is completed, however, this has not been reflected at the document page:

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/

 

Warren, I saw that it has been placed in the agenda of the next telechat, but opsdir review is also missing.

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

El 27/6/19 19:43, "Jordi Palet Martínez" <jordi.palet@theipv6company.com> escribió:

 

Thanks a lot Meral!

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

El 27/6/19 18:43, "Meral Shirazipour" <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> escribió:

 

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

 

For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

 

Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06

 

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour

Review Date: 2019-06-27

IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-28

IESG Telechat date: NA

 

 

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Informational RFC .

 

 

Major issues:

 

Minor issues:

 

Nits/editorial comments:

 

 

 

Best Regards,

Meral

---

Meral Shirazipour

Ericsson Research

www.ericsson.com



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.