Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 07 January 2016 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258221A8978; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C9lvtnAZ1CWA; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:20:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268E81A898B; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:20:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702BE2CCBF; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:20:42 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WHeYhNi_qRtb; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:20:41 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0482CCAE; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:20:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2D347F27-558E-4034-AFC0-E33D96777B44"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR05MB1985617B205AE8B040CF2D80AEEF0@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:20:39 +0200
Message-Id: <125125BB-D359-4AF9-9139-A958024F1258@piuha.net>
References: <BLUPR05MB1985617B205AE8B040CF2D80AEEF0@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/pWKMyMEdFdpOHpXVberFcJc0g68>
Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pals-congcons.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-congcons.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:20:49 -0000

Thanks for your review, Ron!

On 16 Dec 2015, at 18:55, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> The authors of this draft have informed me this document is required by the wg charter. So, I withdraw any criticisms about this document's limited scope. The scope was dictated by the charter.
> 
>                                              Ron
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ronald Bonica
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 4:01 PM
>> To: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>rg>; 'draft-ietf-pals-congcons.all@ietf.org'
>> <draft-ietf-pals-congcons.all@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Gen-ART review of
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
>> ART, please see the FAQ at
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>> 
>> Document:                                      draft-ietf-pals-congcons-01
>> Reviewer:                                        Ron Bonica
>> Review Date:                                  2015-12-15
>> IETF LC End Date:                          2015-12-15
>> IETF Telechat Date:                      TBD
>> 
>> Summary:          This document is ready for publication
>> 
>> In summary, draft-ietf-congcons-01:
>> 
>> - applies only to pseudowires that run over something other than MPLS (e.g.,
>> GRE)
>> - concludes that no additional mechanisms are needed for elastic
>> pseudowires
>> - concludes that an inelastic pseudowire MAY shutdown when it experiences
>> higher-than-acceptable loss, latency or jitter
>> - observes that that for TDM PWs, as loss rate increases, higher-than-
>> acceptable loss generally occurs before the fixed-rate TDM PW could cause
>> serious problems for competing congestion-responsive traffic
>> - Therefore, no additional mechanisms are needed for inelastic pseudowires,
>> either
>> 
>> I see nothing objectionable in the draft. However, its scope is extremely
>> limited and it conclusions are not earthshattering. Nonetheless, the work is
>> sound and deserves publication.
>> 
>> Major Issues: None
>> 
>> Minor Issues: None
>> 
>> Editorial Issues:
>> 
>> Ron Bonica
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art