Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06

[Qin Wu <[e-mail]>]

Agree, Thanks!

Regards!
-Qin
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[e-mail]>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>
Cc: "General Area Review Team" <[e-mail]>; "Shida Schubert" <[e-mail]>; "Gonzalo Camarillo" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 4:51 AM
Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06


Hi Vijay,

Thank you for your review. I agree with your comment. It was actually
one of the WGLC comments:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg00395.html

This comment in particular seems to have fallen through the cracks.
Thanks for catching it.

Cheers,
Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 1:22 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: General Area Review Team; Charles Eckel (eckelcu); Shida Schubert;
> Gonzalo Camarillo
> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06
> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
> Review Date: May-31-2012
> IETF LC End Date: June-14-2012
> IESG Telechat date: Not known
> 
> Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard; it has one minor
> comment that should be fixed before publication.
> 
> Major: 0
> Minor: 1
> Nits: 0
> 
> Minor:
> 
> - In S6, the text says that "... the use of security mechanisms with
>   RTP, as documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] SHOULD apply."
> 
>   I am puzzled by the normative language here.  Won't it be more
proper
>   to simply say that "... the use of security mechanisms with RTP, as
>   documented in Section 9 of [RFC3550] apply."
> 
>   The use of SHOULD seem to indicate that there are certain cases
>   during measurement reporting where the security considerations do
not
>   apply.  Surely you do not mean that, do you?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [e-mail]
> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/