Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct-04

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Thu, 05 July 2012 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E4B21F85F8 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 06:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.088, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BBNzUnq95kP4 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 06:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D667821F8463 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 06:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so8220164ggn.31 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 06:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=HNYFBk/hKdtaYME+PYc+bRNqL9vVcUdKOL1sUS9RByk=; b=JrDqB/TrXzfduX9bWJd8AO3ZNrAWaSbh1L28rQ0JEYq0i3Bs33r2Ni/NlyYKvrTRBc 183CiNb2gZ+MeBrmnWexdTl78iAL091Cu5zpqKSiCETNoxWFAaCeDs0OrnETSHVYlSPd cjM4j1fRvtW9L1roCubccRNVRmtqnHsO8uQktPUxgs9TTvdzt8Ss/KbR91wSPgg42xzP d+1ioeDuQqM9YPICMPMtJvEmXi9VUxDN9cFS30YU4iBSDmmo+SJ0dC1sku3pkxGiuO+k tHR8pSrDvEWWCDighNtjdfxCyRT4VULwUVZbcuX8aEufffbOzU9iHm/rWuyk7stOrwyr WqzQ==
Received: by 10.50.212.98 with SMTP id nj2mr13991778igc.35.1341496245016; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 06:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.16.227 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 06:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <25DC600D0CC1F2479C7053ADEB93004E69A089545A@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <25DC600D0CC1F2479C7053ADEB93004E69A089545A@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 09:50:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEEXKTDDDzfAZnitwBr57chJKP+ApuEb2hiJzLL1yL5sgw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:50:32 -0000

Hi Meral,

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Meral Shirazipour
<meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>gt;.
>
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct-04
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review Date: 2012-07-03
> IETF LC End Date: 2012-06-20
> IESG Telechat date: 2012-07-05
>
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I have some last editorial comments.
>
> Major issues:
> -none
>
> Minor issues:
> -none
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
> -Consistency with RFC6325, [Page 18], below the table, "end station service disable bit" --missing dash--> "end-station service disable bit"

OK.

> -Consistency: Acronyms are usually spelled out, then followed by the acronym in parenthesis [when first used]. On few occasions this has been reversed, ex. check for:
> "EISS (Enhanced Internal Sublayer Service)", "DRB (Designated RBridge)" vs "Reverse Path Forwarding Check (RPFC)"

OK. I think acronym followed by spelling out in parenthesis is
probably best for uniform format.

> -Informative References, Ref. [802], please if you get a chance verify again the date of this document :)
> I checked again on the version freely available at http://standards.ieee.org/about/get/802/802.html, it says "7 February, 2002". I could not find anything dated "8 March, 2002".

IEEE 802 distributes a CD of all of its standards to all of its active
members (I believe to all the voting members of all of its working
groups) each year in November. (Actually, they are physically handed
out at the November 802 plenary meeting but if you qualify you can
pick it up at a later meeting if you don't attend the November meeting
or forget to pick it up there.) Under separate cover, I will send to
you the pdf for IEEE Std 802-2001 from the CD that was distributed to
me in November 2011. It says 8 March 2002 on the title page (and
"Approved 6 December 2001" on the next page).

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

> Thanks,
> Meral
>
> ---
> Meral Shirazipour
> Ericsson
> Research
> www.ericsson.com