Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-mobility-03

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <> Tue, 09 August 2016 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A81712D518; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.767
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.767 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e76WJPWb9fvm; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B039D12D112; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=7217; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1470761351; x=1471970951; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=KMfpKLQfwHtakefzHK5Ya23+NZhT9q3x32a1jOJKXUc=; b=IUYPykmuh9yDmenM2gD7uQT7ZTDO5p2WuHVcx8O8zKI/BHCe8xcMYe9P 2tRtKJ/ucvtby/n2rw+BUPX7jyZFZ6q3sTJWDhSmOQkju8q0GkkP9hDMD Te2hJIoLTCRql+ZlnVMPNhl2+SFokZA1G66+euPZ4+O5ir/h+tNrMyHAi 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,495,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="138020626"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2016 16:49:10 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u79GnAn0031640 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:49:10 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:49:10 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:49:10 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <>
To: Pete Resnick <>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-mobility-03
Thread-Index: AQHR8Zg9AFN8sQqqCkCqzJzOS7OCiaBAB0aQgAEZLoD//7aQAA==
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 16:49:10 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_92d4a285d1534ba9b58d27941a53b8b7XCHRCD017ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: General Area Review Team <>, "" <>, "" <>, IETF <>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-mobility-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 16:49:13 -0000

From: Pete Resnick []
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 9:36 PM
To: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) <>
Cc: General Area Review Team <>;;; IETF <>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-mobility-03

Thanks for the response Tiru. Trimming down to the one open issue below; everything else looks perfect:

On 8 Aug 2016, at 23:50, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote:

3.1.2 - Change "MUST" to "will" both times in the second paragraph.

I presume you're OK with those changes?

[TR] Yes.

The last sentence of the section I don't understand; it doesn't seem to have any interoperability implications, and I don't see why the client can't examine the ticket in any way it wants. Either justify the sentence or delete it.

[TR] Even if the client examines the ticket there is no guarantee that it will be able decode its fields. This line is added to suggest that there is no need for the client to examine the ticket.

Well, "no need" is very different than "MUST NOT". If you really want to keep the sentence (and I still think you could just delete it), I would suggest simply changing it to something like: "Note: There is no guarantee that the fields in the ticket are going to be decodable to a client, and therefore attempts by a client to examine the ticket are unlikely to be useful."

[TR] Works for me, updated.


Pete Resnick<>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478