IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 03 April 2018 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D67A126DCA; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=fuC+P00e; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Yox2epKc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HYRlRFvUg3M2; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 677C4126E64; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBCD218F2; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:49:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:49:08 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ismVa0Pa5lmIWV4WhDpEJji1iELRx N1TVKR3W56nchM=; b=fuC+P00eB8v19yoR9n0oHUK7dVWFJYah/uiEmPOKdkVLO DS78xwA5ZApUlsfUuHHdzlLyKQZ9nQ7lgVjr1beE/xMJsIoZYc8CHstgdJMGCiMX Mu9GtAa43IXcCkLWe0aFWSOP/2BE5zsTtVWSwt+RLs0bFRZM86LqN/VR/E0x9t7Y Nw2ahpzhBCt2ck5iHDNoOURghHL0fsuIOEnCVIzX9Rye0ECezm7ik3Q4h3HtFbj7 9D0H/pFTlo1L5sjQQ7npeO0bMdZzMiGNyPSDOksIKWm5gxYTZjL+xZ6C4jm/6Jlz GyGrFhL6WIgsD5QhKphcg0kLcfNUkVXakA8yvQpUw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ismVa0 Pa5lmIWV4WhDpEJji1iELRxN1TVKR3W56nchM=; b=Yox2epKc4VwNyAeygaBMET oiLJD2RFa3JfgydlY8eRy5c8cV4wcmN2liBCTA/Yt8SoZDBEquhai8CCJn7zq8hY f/i5dwUbsNMOi+TpzyuU2/QUL9IW8eLwW0CELHl5JW+0R93h0oUFaPmIJIVHiaYd GadLDwNTtBb9KiOVGlc0QEfJDpeo7InxO8b/3dF/vaaMHKLgSAvpf/ZnMvtlo1Gd fBYXW677TFauKREd3kaAAMtF4sfEIGsO5qdkf0lk7tqjYn1a0l4F1UafMXBWAC5Q jYETUzHm3QofBB2hOxkH+/Jw0MQucXr+jQZ/8tiJYE4MEsB/kgd0jTnbfLU/wBhw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:pMzDWjJS_xlHVJUmUZP9qDloXmW-1qU8VdxlE5dIGkR-3cJUc5S29A>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro3.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.78]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 352B4E444F; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:49:08 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR0201MB360390DC4463FD2AD1F9354084C50@CY4PR0201MB3603.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:49:07 -0400
Cc: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type.all@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F8FED71B-24F4-49E3-8C4D-934C1EA9A269@cooperw.in>
References: <151965692093.31478.13701823396454241011@ietfa.amsl.com> <CY4PR0201MB360390DC4463FD2AD1F9354084C50@CY4PR0201MB3603.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/qMIVbKZAzD3Bk1r5tHxvDKM8HG8>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:49:12 -0000

Roni, thanks for your reviews. Jonathan, thanks for your response. I have entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Mar 2, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Roni
> 
> Many thanks for the review.  You are right, in this case we meant "IETF Review".  I will update the document.
> 
> Cheers
> Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] 
> Sent: 26 February 2018 14:55
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: pce@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type.all@ietf.org
> Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08
> 
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-??
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review Date: 2018-02-26
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-06
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-05
> 
> Summary:
> The document is almost ready for publication as standard track RFC Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 1. in section 7.2 "The allocation policy for this new registry  should be by IETF Consensus" why not use one of RFC8126 well known policies?
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email