[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-mib-05.txt (resent???)

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Sat, 18 June 2011 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBF711E811B for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TW4lOFVoahbd for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC74311E80B3 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5IN7wSO035372; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 01:07:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201106182307.p5IN7wSO035372@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 01:07:58 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-mib.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-mib-05.txt (resent???)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:08:01 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-mib-05.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20110527
IETF LC End Date: 20110512
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - Toc page 2 and 9 page 67: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 5 page 7: incoherent zip/country order for Japan

 - 5 page 9: pmip6Stats:pmip6BindingRegcounters ->
                                       ^
             pmip6Stats:pmip6BindingRegcounters
  (fortunately it is in a comment, but an ASN.1 comment :-)

 - 5 page 16: reindent pmip6MagProxyCOATable description
 (same pages 39 and 40 for pmip6LmaMinDelayBeforeBCEDelete)

 - 5 page 22 (pmip6MagBLlMnIdentifier): bad wording (the two is for
  the length, not the value).
  same page 28 for pmip6BindingMnLlIdentifier

 - 5 page 24: reformat pmip6MagBLAccessTechnologyType description

 - 5 page 24 (pmip6MagBLTimeRecentlyAccepted):
  acknowledgement -> acknowledgment
  (same page 29 for pmip6BindingMagLinkLocalAddress,
   page 30 for pmip6MissingMnIdentifierOption,
   page 31 for pmip6NotLMAForThisMobileNode, etc)

 - 5 page 31 (pmip6MissingMnIdentifierOption): router. -> router,

 - 5 page 37 (pmip6CounterDiscontinuityTime): viz. ???

 - 5 page 41 (pmip6LmaTimestampValidityWindow): bad wording:
  length of time ???

 - 5 page 50 (pmip6CoreReadOnlyCompliance): missing final '.' in
  description 

 - 6 page 63: extra space in 'pmip6MobileNodeGeneratedTimestampInUse :'

 - 6 page 63: IPSec -> IPsec

 - 10 page 67: presentation should be uniformized.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

PS: I don't remember if I sent this review, so anyway I resend it.