Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 03 February 2012 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BA521F8574 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:02:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.281
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.318, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2cN5sdCsmGQl for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:02:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FD721F8537 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:02:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LYT006PN4YA94@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:01:23 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LYT00B754YACH@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:01:22 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml209-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGU49226; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:01:22 +0800
Received: from SZXEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.137) by szxeml209-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.184) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:00:48 +0800
Received: from w53375q (10.138.41.130) by szxeml410-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:01:13 +0800
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:01:12 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.130]
To: "Miguel A. Garcia" <Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com>
Message-id: <913D0A1AF3824099B6E8F09DDDF76BFF@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <4F2AA2F8.4010004@ericsson.com> <CAProHATtfqmXk0-EVOSDbQZqpNW-nFtrchA56XAMP2XWpnd6oA@mail.gmail.com> <4F2B8A50.9030901@ericsson.com> <9FDA0EEDC44A4921B6D7D5A536D96BC0@china.huawei.com> <4F2B9358.3000503@ericsson.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:24:12 -0800
Cc: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>, Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:02:56 -0000

Okay, your proposal looks good to me, many thanks.

Regards!
-Qin Wu
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Miguel A. Garcia" <Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com>
To: "Qin Wu" <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Cc: "Zhen Cao" <zehn.cao@gmail.com>; "Hui Deng" <denghui02@gmail.com>; "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; "General Area Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07


> Hi Qin Wu:
> 
> As far as I remember, there is a policy in force that does not allow URLs 
> in RFCs, in particular in the IANA section. I believe that the motivation 
> is that URLs can change with time.
> 
> The proposal is (something around these lines):
> 
>     Further, this document instructs IANA to add a new lable in the User 
> Specific Root Keys (USRK) Key Labels of the Extended Master Session Key 
> (EMSK) Parameters registry, as follows:
> 
>         EAP Early-Authentication Root Key@ietf.org
> 
> /Miguel
> 
> 
> On 03/02/2012 8:43, Qin Wu wrote:
>> Hi, Miguel:
>> I think you are looking for this registry.
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/emsk-parameters/emsk-parameters.xml
>> To make clear, the proposed change is replace the OLD Text
>> "
>> Further, this document registers a Early authentication usage label
>>     from the "USRK Key Labels" name space with a value:
>>
>>        EAP Early-Authentication Root Key@ietf.org
>> "
>> With the NEW Text:
>> "
>> Further, this document registers a Early authentication usage label
>>     from the "User Specific Root Keys (USRK) Key Labels" name space maintained at
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/emsk-parameters/emsk-parameters.xml
>>   with a value:
>>
>>        EAP Early-Authentication Root Key@ietf.org
>> "
>> Hope this addresses your comment.
>>
>> Regards!
>> -Qin Wu
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Miguel A. Garcia"<Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com>
>> To: "Zhen Cao"<zehn.cao@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "Hui Deng"<denghui02@gmail.com>;<sunseawq@huawei.com>; "Stephen Farrell"<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; "General Area Review Team"<gen-art@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:18 PM
>> Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07
>>
>>
>>> Zhen,
>>>
>>> The issue with IANA is double:
>>>
>>> On one side, you need to clearly indicate to IANA which registry they
>>> need to change.
>>>
>>> On another side, someone reading this RFC should be able to go to
>>> www.iana.org and find the registry.
>>>
>>> The solve both issues you don't need a reference to RFC 5295. What you
>>> need to say "Extended Master Session Key (EMSK) Parameters registry" in
>>> the IANA considerations section, because this is the official name by
>>> which the registry is known.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>>           Miguel
>>>
>>> On 03/02/2012 8:11, Zhen Cao wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   - Another topic, Section 9 (IANA Considerations) reads:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Further, this document registers a Early authentication usage label
>>>>>>      from the "USRK Key Labels" name space with a value:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         EAP Early-Authentication RootKey@ietf.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I am missing the sentence to name the master registry where the USRK Key
>>>>>>   Labels subregistry is stored. This is the Extended Master Session Key (EMSK)
>>>>>>   Parameters registry (I guess). And probably this comment is also valid for
>>>>>>   the rest of the IANA actions: the main registry is not named, and it is hard
>>>>>>   to find it.
>>>> [CZ]: EMSK or DSRK lable is defined in the section 8.1 "Key Lables" of
>>>> RFC5295. We will add reference to RFC5295 to fix this. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Miguel A. Garcia
>>> +34-91-339-3608
>>> Ericsson Spain
> 
> -- 
> Miguel A. Garcia
> +34-91-339-3608
> Ericsson Spain
>