Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20

[Xufeng Liu <[e-mail]>]

Hi Russ,

Thanks for checking on this document.

Regarding the Security Considerations section, there is a recent update to
the guidelines https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines.
[RFC5246] has been obsoleted by [RFC8446],  and [RFC6536] has been
obsoleted by [RFC8341]. Therefore, this document has been updated with
[RFC8446] and [RFC8341] instead, according to the updated guidelines.

Please let us know if this is correct.

Thanks,
- Xufeng

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 9:43 AM Russ Housley via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Not Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2019-05-02
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-05-15
> IESG Telechat date: Unknown
>
> Summary: Not Ready
>
> Major Concerns:
>
> See https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines.  The
> Security Considerations section MUST follow the template provided on
> that web page, and the guidelines require normative references to
> [RFC5246] and [RFC6536], among others. These two RFCs do not appear
> in the references.
>
>
> Minor Concerns:
>
> None
>
>
> Nits:
>
> The TOC contains several lines where the heading goes past the column
> of page numbers.  Reformatting would make this much easier to read.
>
>