RE: [Gen-art] re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt- dnsdomain-03.txt

["Gray, Eric" <[e-mail]>]

Renxiang,

	You should consult with Jari and the applicable WG chairs,
before taking direct action on these last call comments.  Jari 
has already replied that the draft will be "re-cycled" through
the WG(s) for review again.

--
Eric 

--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: CTO YAN Renxiang [mailto:[e-mail]] 
--> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 8:56 PM
--> To: Gray, Eric
--> Cc: [e-mail]; Jari Arkko
--> Subject: [Gen-art] re: Gen-ART LC review of 
--> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain-03.txt
--> 
--> Hi, Eric,
--> 
--> Thanks for the review.
--> 
--> We will revise the draft to resolve the issues and and ask 
--> for WG review 
--> when it's ready.
--> 
--> Regards,
--> Renxiang
--> 
--> > -----原始邮件-----
--> > 发件人: Gray, Eric [mailto:[e-mail]]
--> > 发送时间: 2006年9月29日 23:32
--> > 收件人: CTO YAN Renxiang; SSMD Jiang YingLan; CTO Gui 
--> > Luoning; Xiaodong
--> > Duan
--> > 抄送: [e-mail]; Jari Arkko
--> > 主题: Gen-ART LC review of 
--> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain-03.txt
--> > 
--> > 
--> > Authors,
--> > 
--> > 	I am the the assigned General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) 
--> > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see 
--> > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). 
--> > 
--> > 	Please resolve these comments along with any other Last 
--> > Call comments you may receive. 
--> > 
--> > 
--> > 
--> > Document: 
--> > --------
--> > 
--> >             Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6
--> >       <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain-03.txt>
--> > 
--> > Reviewer: Eric Gray
--> > 
--> > Review Date: 9/30/2006
--> > 
--> > IETF LC Date: through 10/10/2006
--> > 
--> > Summary:
--> > -------
--> > 
--> > 	This draft is not quite ready for publication as a 
--> > Proposed Standard. 
--> > 
--> > Comments:  
--> > 
--> > 	The relatively minor shortcomings of this draft have been
--> > exhaustively digested on the following lists:
--> > 
--> > 	DHC Working Group ([e-mail])
--> > 	IETF-Announce ([e-mail])
--> > 	IETF-Discussion ([e-mail])
--> > 
--> > People commenting in the (public) discussion include all of the 
--> > following (no special order - some complaining, some defending):
--> > 
--> > 	John C Klensin
--> > 	Frank Ellermann
--> > 	Jeffrey Hutzelman
--> > 	Ralph Droms
--> > 	Matt Larson
--> > 	David W Hankins
--> > 	Dave Crocker
--> > 	Fred Baker
--> > 	Harald Alvestrand
--> > 	Keith Moore
--> > 	Stig Venaas
--> > 
--> > 	The draft is 5 pages long - meaning that it has less than two 
--> > pages of non-template content.
--> > 
--> > 	If any one thing has emerged consistently in the discussion,
--> > it is that there are some areas that need clearing up.  I 
--> have been
--> > following the discussion, and have reviewed the document 
--> itself.  I
--> > have nothing new to add to this discussion except to congratulate 
--> > the authors on having created so succinct an Internet Draft as a
--> > candidate for Proposed Standard.
--> > 
--> > 	However, I fully support Ralph Droms' suggestion that the ID
--> > be taken back under the DHC working group aegis (cooperating with 
--> > the DNSOP working group) and modified - per his suggestions - i.e.
--> > 
--> > 	1. clarify the use case motivating this option
--> > 	2. clarify/reword the phrase "domain suffix"
--> > 	3. simplify the reference to RFC 1035 encoding
--> > 
--> > I would add to this, in addition, that the clarifications 
--> referred 
--> > to in number 2 above should include clarifying the entire phrase 
--> > starting with:
--> > 
--> > "The domain suffix in the 'domain suffix' field MUST 
--> include only one
--> >  item, ..."
--> > 
--> > 	From the discussion, I believe that phrases "domain suffix" and 
--> > "one item" both need some clarification.
--> > 
--> > --
--> > Eric Gray
--> > 
--> > 
--> > 
--> > 
--> > 
--> > 
--> 
--> _______________________________________________
--> Gen-art mailing list
--> [e-mail]
--> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
--> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art