Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-ip-06

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 02 October 2019 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BCC12002F; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 13:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=BhneJZYv; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=1vCSy/MZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wpnim46dH-aE; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 13:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E1C120018; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 13:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A2B20F60; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 16:23:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Oct 2019 16:23:05 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=h IdvXc9C5dfUY0z+yIEh1kI2LiY7FaKSPBhKiYPWifs=; b=BhneJZYvb3c1FuP/w 8Rt3oyVUwfEhgnj0WG7Yze5y9/fPUey2GXq3j3NigYRs805/2hTPEtLCgcjR/qMP 3b03HUvcVmnY1P8k2Uo7a7Ry6VFwMggjKtSJUC9GcQ9kkcivKIvN0A4ViSSSdUQu Uqagb1o/62QHT00E+wx7kL9dWPTeG9tKEVrV1UQ36kVjDnhBH/oiFMy/fqjsjnkB 87nJ3hBSIWY0bYjrxat+Z7BZX8P3zABbD5hcpim4Kx316jy/PQdrwxgKFj+3V5PZ ooVcZC3ICeW7vXeREAJpbI/9MXzYjMjKRE6HVsdBeE0TwnNcJwPbXeiIDdtn2L1r Ex8hA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=hIdvXc9C5dfUY0z+yIEh1kI2LiY7FaKSPBhKiYPWi fs=; b=1vCSy/MZHG/0nHjSU43QymcAZ6KYiqBBonqt9lXQH8Zzzd3G6N1vcVaii ycakzR41naEo9x94492LchMJBPmqQHxR566R+iUzty/qwcTmeO64bDUytZ2tJvCV 3u+hgCFThYhurQxGZujkYKiWxmYH0BByo05PoEtiLsDQTSy9GkmdLZC7tXA6hUF2 7MpvD0ZB6fhZBPUxBUCfhUqUp5dU4C1cMVxhFwl6M7UcgByyW7D+wj2RF6e583Mn ZYumMQctqK6+PioLiUE9rv63D3Koji+lq4IlIj9jLcVNeeECqEEP+rHCkizyZTfD rMYFN+qnTmwy7SgZh2Fyhw2J8UMRg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:KAeVXcG8nnUdE-c560YinlvMgcQS5R8i9AZwcSxv1_wbrScKw21u6w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrgeeigddugeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrg hinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedruddujedrjeehnecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:KAeVXez5WL8yxpzgtJjUVKrF-XO8Zj_rgGHhrOhJm0bmmk5O2_kNqg> <xmx:KAeVXVu_ksWwSpYjJw-aqImYQPT3UxXASuLnMFfDr8Tj5XGUS4ETqQ> <xmx:KAeVXT1PNtFBOWzxuRFvrN2RWlvMz-MplYXHH97z4xjA5mLEDTsrLQ> <xmx:KQeVXZ0L62tK9qAx9xJ0SwOs1y_G5KFwaTaDxKQfET-Z57NZOSTaQA>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro3.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6CF15D60063; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 16:23:04 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <155957750491.24911.15993438190923938370@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 16:23:02 -0400
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-acme-ip.all@ietf.org, acme@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <82ABA017-00A6-434D-AFBD-6E32E26B0373@cooperw.in>
References: <155957750491.24911.15993438190923938370@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/r1xM4q-5MAa9YXHAJy87Frvj9PQ>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-ip-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 20:23:08 -0000

Robert, thanks for your review.

> On Jun 3, 2019, at 11:58 AM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-acme-ip-06
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review Date: 2019-06-03
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-12
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: Ready for publication as a proposed standard rfc.
> 
> One minor nit: The security considerations section reads oddly. I'm not sure
> what it means for an extension to deviate from a threat model. I think you want
> to say "does not add to" rather than "does not deviate”?

This seems like a useful edit to me.

I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art