Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06.txt

David Mandelberg <david@mandelberg.org> Mon, 26 February 2018 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <david@mandelberg.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA42127275 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:31:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xkYABS0IdKUi for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:31:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB487126D73 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:31:32 -0800 (PST)
X_CMAE_Category: , ,
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=YuZNfMQX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OXtaa+9CFT7WVSERtyqzJw==:117 a=OXtaa+9CFT7WVSERtyqzJw==:17 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=NTnny0joGdQA:10 a=Op4juWPpsa0A:10 a=bmmO2AaSJ7QA:10 a=BTUBnpS-AAAA:8 a=Z12Nzn3fJibkDg910g4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=pblkFgjdBCuYZ9-HdJ6i:22
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
X-Authed-Username: ZHNlb21uQHJjbi5jb20=
Authentication-Results: smtp03.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=david@mandelberg.org; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral
Authentication-Results: smtp03.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=david@mandelberg.org; sender-id=neutral
Authentication-Results: smtp03.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=dseomn@rcn.com; auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: neutral (smtp03.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.43.168 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mandelberg.org)
Received: from [209.6.43.168] ([209.6.43.168:34904] helo=uriel.mandelberg.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from <david@mandelberg.org>) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 4A/55-00908-074449A5; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:31:28 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.152] (DD-WRT [192.168.1.1]) by uriel.mandelberg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F27D1C6099; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:31:27 -0500 (EST)
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>, gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-sidr-slurm.all@ietf.org
References: <201802261624.w1QGOKdk042835@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: David Mandelberg <david@mandelberg.org>
Message-ID: <c171cff9-543c-133e-ade0-5da5267c7735@mandelberg.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:31:25 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201802261624.w1QGOKdk042835@givry.fdupont.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/r96n0nB_jpbAroVF2C_2OUmfY70>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:31:35 -0000

On 02/26/2018 11:24 AM, Francis Dupont wrote:
>   - authors' addresses page 17: I am not sure that to be affilated to
>    his own personal organization is to be "unaffiliated"... IMHO the
>    problem is the XML schema requires the organization field to be set (:-).

I think that's a hold-over from when I worked for Google and didn't feel 
like going through Google's approval process to get permission to list 
my affiliation. Now, I do business under the legal entity David 
Mandelberg, LLC, but I never really intended to use that name anywhere 
other than taxes/banks/etc. Would it be better to list that instead of 
unaffiliated? Or maybe "self-employed" or some other phrase?

-- 
Freelance cyber security consultant, software developer, and more
https://david.mandelberg.org/