Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06.txt

David Mandelberg <> Mon, 26 February 2018 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA42127275 for <>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:31:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xkYABS0IdKUi for <>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:31:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB487126D73 for <>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:31:32 -0800 (PST)
X_CMAE_Category: , ,
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=YuZNfMQX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OXtaa+9CFT7WVSERtyqzJw==:117 a=OXtaa+9CFT7WVSERtyqzJw==:17 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=NTnny0joGdQA:10 a=Op4juWPpsa0A:10 a=bmmO2AaSJ7QA:10 a=BTUBnpS-AAAA:8 a=Z12Nzn3fJibkDg910g4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=pblkFgjdBCuYZ9-HdJ6i:22
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
X-Authed-Username: ZHNlb21uQHJjbi5jb20=
Authentication-Results:; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral
Authentication-Results:; sender-id=neutral
Authentication-Results:; auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: neutral ( is neither permitted nor denied by domain of
Received: from [] ([] by (envelope-from <>) (ecelerity r(Core: with ESMTPSA (cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 4A/55-00908-074449A5; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:31:28 -0500
Received: from [] (DD-WRT []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F27D1C6099; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:31:27 -0500 (EST)
To: Francis Dupont <>,
References: <>
From: David Mandelberg <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:31:25 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:31:35 -0000

On 02/26/2018 11:24 AM, Francis Dupont wrote:
>   - authors' addresses page 17: I am not sure that to be affilated to
>    his own personal organization is to be "unaffiliated"... IMHO the
>    problem is the XML schema requires the organization field to be set (:-).

I think that's a hold-over from when I worked for Google and didn't feel 
like going through Google's approval process to get permission to list 
my affiliation. Now, I do business under the legal entity David 
Mandelberg, LLC, but I never really intended to use that name anywhere 
other than taxes/banks/etc. Would it be better to list that instead of 
unaffiliated? Or maybe "self-employed" or some other phrase?

Freelance cyber security consultant, software developer, and more