Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-05

"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Mon, 23 September 2019 05:01 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A11120105; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 22:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Wtn4iEQRYax; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 22:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 989FC120104; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 22:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 688EC352F8B0A7C1CAEF; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:01:28 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.213) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:01:27 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.207]) by DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.213]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:01:21 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-core-hop-limit.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-core-hop-limit.all@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-05
Thread-Index: AQHVcUmuXxbPJdHB3E6qYwe0zeL4n6c4sylg
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 05:01:20 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD23D6A192@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <156915425127.1340.18230115848839912205@ietfa.amsl.com> <20190922132830.kemraqhnzcjxprt2@EMB-918HFH01>
In-Reply-To: <20190922132830.kemraqhnzcjxprt2@EMB-918HFH01>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.202.58]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/rAeoBA95X9Iia2to8Ox08LmxfYk>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 05:01:33 -0000

Hi,
I looked at section 5.4.6 and now I understand that the option is elective, non-repeatable and part of cache key.
That will mean that the option number should have the two least significant bits as 0 and the next 3 bits some combination that is not all 1's, see also https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252#section-5.10

I think you need to recommend a number for the option to IANA that will allow understanding of the characteristics of the option, IANA cannot allocate a random number to a new option

Roni



-----Original Message-----
From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jaime Jiménez
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2019 4:29 PM
To: Roni Even
Cc: draft-ietf-core-hop-limit.all@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; core@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-05

Dear Roni,

I believe the CUNR bit mask is defined in 5.4.6 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252#page-39
I assume it has to be added for every new option defined. 

Ciao!

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 05:10:51AM -0700, Roni Even via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area 
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by 
> the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like 
> any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-??
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review Date: 2019-09-22
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-09-27
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with 
> nits
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> In section 6.2 I am not sure why you have CUNR , I did not see these 
> values in
> RFC7252 section 12.2 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252#section-12.2  
> or in the registry
> 
>          +--------+---+---+---+---+------------------+-----------+
>          | Number | C | U | N | R | Name             | Reference |
>          +--------+---+---+---+---+------------------+-----------+
>          |  TBA2  |   |   |   |   | Hop-Limit        | [RFCXXXX] |
>          +--------+---+---+---+---+------------------+-----------+
>              C=Critical, U=Unsafe, N=NoCacheKey, R=Repeatable
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art