[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-08
Christer Holmberg via Datatracker <email@example.com> Sun, 22 November 2020 23:11 UTC
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D513A0FB6; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 15:11:53 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Reply-To: Christer Holmberg <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 15:11:53 -0800
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-08
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 23:11:53 -0000
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-08 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 2020-11-22 IETF LC End Date: 2020-12-02 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is well written, and easy to read, and I don't have any technical issues. However, I do have some questions (one that I consider major, the rest minor/editorial) which I think needs clarifications: Major issues: Q1_MA: Section 6.1. says: "The URNs generated according to the rules defined in this document result in long-term stable unique identifiers for the devices." - What are those rules? In Section 3.3 I do see the following statement: "The DEV URN type SHOULD only be used for persistent identifiers, such as hardware-based identifiers or cryptographic identifiers based on keys intended for long-term usage." Is that what you refer to as rules? Or, have I missed something? Also, to me the statement seems like an important applicability statement for DEV URNs. If so, should there be a separate Applicability (or similar) section earlier in the document, which points it out? Minor issues: Q2_MI: Section 3.1. says: "The DEV URNs identify devices with device-specific identifiers such as network card hardware addresses." - Can there be multiple DEV URNs associated with a single device? Q3_MI: Section 3.1. says: "DEV URN is global in scope." - What does that actually mean? Nits/editorial comments: Q4_ED: In the Introduction, SenML and RD are given as examples where the URN may be useful. It would be nice to exactly see some usage examples of the URN. Section 5 only contains examples of the URN itself.
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-c… Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] [core] Genart last call review of d… Jari Arkko