IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-03

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Mon, 11 April 2016 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2299812DEAD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D07avDM7zpjf for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51F7A12DE5A for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2692; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1460403125; x=1461612725; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=N3GWillPLso60CKbpb3YKnwGkqeElxoq4hy0OHsY/KI=; b=ULyc6+lbNkdT3lNZFn7I8BqcaUHnPGc65/OeSQf7LW+WFPQatkauP7y9 9UFxiYnT7YqFRv8mvAzaozyxX43hibPmbVgnJN8UXARjgva0K5126MDW9 0xLU6PVYgqtZYza0xNhiJwih17CCPnpMV36UryYAFtMJu2Ouze+13qt/p E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 841
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C0AgDR+gtX/4wNJK1cgzeBQQ8GulkOgXKGDQKBLTgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEEBAQEDAWcSBQsCAQgYLjIlAQEEDgUOiBEIv14BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQENCIYhgXWCVodqgisFmAQBgyOBZokCjw2PJQEeAUODZ2yJB34BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,469,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="92388217"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Apr 2016 19:32:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (xch-rtp-005.cisco.com [64.101.220.145]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3BJW28O026803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:32:03 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:32:01 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:32:02 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-03
Thread-Index: AdGJr7rcjvX5F9BJTyWL3hYZBuU8mQAPKL6AApEnRwAABGe4AAAB78OA
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:32:01 +0000
Message-ID: <7CA3D497-FEEB-42ED-B8A7-DE3893405A31@cisco.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751A4F61@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <0B9791B7-46D6-465E-9F3D-3982B59B32C2@cisco.com> <20160411163026.GC16012@pfrc.org> <D3316672.11E365%aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3316672.11E365%aretana@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.101.176]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A6CD0031-0397-464A-A5E1-2FCEE3420B9E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/rgRUxHXLCd4YcYAbu7VIs_W0nMc>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:32:08 -0000

> On Apr 11, 2016, at 2:36 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> On 4/11/16, 12:30 PM, "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:54:06PM +0000, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
>> wrote:
>>> Dan,
>>> 
>>> Many thanks for this review!
>>> 
>>> You raise two good questions, here¹s my take:
>>> I do not have a strong opinion one way or another ‹ I will leave this
>>> one to the AD¹s guidance, and I am happy to mark this document as
>>> updating RFC 5881 if that¹s the preferred direction.
>>> Indeed ‹ fixed in our working copy.
>> 
>> I'm of mixed opinion to mark it as updating.  The bulk of the
>> functionality
>> is separate procedures from RFC 5881.  The only thing that is updated is
>> the
>> echo port, which 5881 leaves very much out of scope for what is carried on
>> that port.
>> 
>> I agree that it's worth leaving the final call to Álvaro.
> 
> I don't think this document needs to be marked as updating 5881 because it
> doesn't change the procedures from that RFC, it enhances/extends with
> optional functionality (I.e. What is specified here is not needed for 5881
> implementations to interoperate).
> 

Works for me — agreed.

Thanks,

— Carlos.

> Thanks!
> 
> Alvaro.
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status