Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-00
Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com> Sat, 06 December 2014 17:30 UTC
Return-Path: <simo@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CD11A1A8F for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 09:30:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imZKGqRcPmoI for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 09:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D680F1A1A0F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 09:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB6HTwxY011731 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 6 Dec 2014 12:29:58 -0500
Received: from willson.usersys.redhat.com ([10.3.113.5]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB6HTuI6009165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Dec 2014 12:29:57 -0500
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 12:29:54 -0500
From: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20141206122954.74494fc7@willson.usersys.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A3304DF7C@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A330314A4@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <ldvtx19tu1p.fsf@sarnath.mit.edu> <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A3304DF7C@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/rpHdh_MF7iDCt4Wtiminx_t2jIA
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 10:37:04 -0800
Cc: "draft-ietf-kitten-cammac.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-kitten-cammac.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, Tom Yu <tlyu@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 17:30:07 -0000
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014 02:27:48 +0000 Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> wrote: > > RFC 4120 specifies that a server receiving unknown authorization > > data MUST fail the authentication process. Do you think this needs > > repeating in this document? > > Yes I think it would be good to mentioned it: "As stated in > RFC4120, ..." Hi, I have some reservations on repeating well established concepts from another document. Should we ever amend the other document we risk the 2 documents to become inconsistent. It is also well-known what AD-IF-RELEVANT do, any implementer must know it as it has to be properly dealt with in both clients and KDCs, repeating shouldn't really be necessary. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-… Meral Shirazipour
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Meral Shirazipour
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Tom Yu
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Simo Sorce
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Meral Shirazipour