Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

"Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 26 November 2019 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DAF12010E; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:10:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=J26wNpgk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=TMCpcYK+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Atwuw49cjes; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:10:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75B0F1200EB; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:10:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0C822789; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:10:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:10:03 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=HCChxzl72z9nGBZVR/seMjnTQhDL I/tABGfKqLakZsU=; b=J26wNpgk6rR5+KaXy76+p8++573cB+0G660cDifHeBMC fP1knlqbRciGvdJWX3vBwT1LPz8KZVIa+TcTW25NNTxbzHG+0v/nBijaaW9Rygtu XVpuxGy1yaX1zilrrNEkwqB6WGVX/1yV1TCiJBvA41sIGLG9PHEWYhSvuQ/potEr 08v8wcPdtuYXVasDD6mhIigphPHfCPvHEhzsn/TxevTc2EuVF3sMOTGJyyrC8gHA pmuQWVKD1oUWI2ryXQZCXh6vpTLh3qh2RGFiIO1H3TjQ9CdxMeB1xNeg4tsaeyme Svg3JSxtCmGL0m4xMTdb2TF0D4iHf4hH+nVg3NQBpA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=HCChxz l72z9nGBZVR/seMjnTQhDLI/tABGfKqLakZsU=; b=TMCpcYK+i1pPhbwf0A3C2m iylWDX38Lo0Grd4ghN9GOWxUprMYc1QW+El3PcFx+jxuH2ySQi0XqVoUT3kyJocv teyNL9EJL631UQU+28fGPDh8N1Fl2HGecvsh/wj3XenX1QypzbnRtPoSLDtSzRwW K4c/aAs1pHXHrVa2U4wLjCbnLLDtK89e3bBa9I+bp9lIXek/B5FSEK00yuk1MYsY S/yjKHMpeNrW9UyefBsiOLPhMU9mFdCzwU7Xl6EBtQ450vZE7a4tWQA7fxrJN8SQ 5l3b4D4qtA/N/9AKfbCvwEyTVk3G6kMtln8EW2Tv65X5V93ld7EU8B6/S0/Htfeg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:y7DdXaSoiEfjrc-_b2NrFLGE_gOHg_NwaQcSVtK6_Kac7CAN5QDW2w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudeigedgtdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtnecuvehl uhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:y7DdXTn6lzP1uaaMX0HbzQqNheMSYD8mYrbz7gqj0eqdmyIJXd4HJQ> <xmx:y7DdXQ4gXu-S0bL8I721LtiFGjH0DCQ-OnQqzxB89adqKVj5H2i_qw> <xmx:y7DdXZiVoqCWQi0s34P9FiRE-GnEEYm1fIoprTBwI7dgAkUQj9S19w> <xmx:y7DdXeB4vn1UgWq-z0eDhMqBUodcXctMntu0bps2trIjbf1XbENONw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 371F6E00A2; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:10:03 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-578-g826f590-fmstable-20191119v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <3a7db097-84c0-4c44-aed0-51196a6a16b6@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <157480843342.13609.14136034204321908736@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <157480843342.13609.14136034204321908736@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:09:43 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/s2okP4CdfebV2AhN37_xNcPb6Jg>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 23:10:08 -0000

Thanks for the review Robert,

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, at 09:47, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote:
> Neither the document nor the shepherds write-up acknowledge or explain the
> replacement of RFC6838 with RFC3986 for a reference for specifying fragment
> identifier syntax and semantics (hence dropping the reference to 6838). It
> would be nice to have something captured in the record that supports/explains
> this change.

I did notice this change in my review, but didn't consider it to be significant.  The shift in focus is within the bounds of what I consider editorial discretion as the effect is identical.