[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06
Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 07 January 2021 05:27 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8173A046D; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:27:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <160999724659.20047.15592378976775376321@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 21:27:26 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/sQeXJs6ZU4ga80XkFYFCGKo_u0w>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 05:27:27 -0000
Reviewer: Gyan Mishra Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-?? Reviewer: Gyan Mishra Review Date: 2021-01-06 IETF LC End Date: 2021-01-04 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document updates RFC 3552 Security Considerations for Transient numeric identifiers employed in network protocols. Currently RFC 3552 does not address transient network identifiers exploitation by pervasive monitoring. Major issues: None Minor issues: My suggestion is to maybe have examples section similar to RFC 3552 that gives examples of the security implications of the various types of transient numeric identifiers. An example for IPv6 IID would be using modified EUI64 versus RFC 4941 privacy extension or even RFC 7217 / RFC 8064 stable IID. Nits/editorial comments: None
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-gont-n… Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-go… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review… Lars Eggert