Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-04

[Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Al,

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:23 AM MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Spencer wrote:
>
> If you folks can contact the original authors and ask if they have any
> objections to use of the updated copyright boilerplate now, that may come
> in handy the next time IPPM needs to update 2330.
>
>
>
> If you can't, it's probably best to update the copyright disclaimer now.
>
>
>
> [acm] I updated the disclaimer in the working version.
>
> I think there are a few more editorial comments to resolve.
>

I think we're just waiting for a fairly small -05 revision to put this on a
telechat, is that the way it looks to you?

Spencer


> Al
>
>
>
> *From:* Spencer Dawkins at IETF [mailto:[e-mail]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 8, 2018 1:20 PM
> *To:* Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-04
>
>
>
> Hi, draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6.all,
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Francesca Palombini <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
> > [acm]
> > We can add the pre-5378 disclaimer as a catch-all, but I doubt the
> original
> > authors would make any fuss about the small amount of common text with
> > 2330.
> > Almes, Paxson, Mahdavi and Mathis are all gentlemen and the best of their
> > time.
> >
>
> I'm sure they are :) Just relaying what the id-nits told me.
>
>
>
> If I might make an observation - the discontinuity between pre-5379 and
> post-5370 copyright grants isn't going to get better (until all pre-5370
> RFCs are Historic), and we already have some running code from pre-5370 RFC
> authors becoming unreachable (in extreme cases, because they died).
>
>
>
> If you folks can contact the original authors and ask if they have any
> objections to use of the updated copyright boilerplate now, that may come
> in handy the next time IPPM needs to update 2330.
>
>
>
> If you can't, it's probably best to update the copyright disclaimer now.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Spencer
>
>
>