[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04

Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sun, 15 April 2018 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FA91275F4; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 00:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: <gen-art@ietf.org>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.78.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152377823668.19749.656355412103926878@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 00:43:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/snRbzqkLk7FANoi4udx7t0hPeIo>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 07:43:57 -0000

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2018-04-15
IETF LC End Date: 2018-04-19
IESG Telechat date: 2018-05-10

The document is ready for publication as BCP with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
1. I was wondering what is the process for selecting exploratory meeting site
comparing to sites according to the regular 1-1-1 policy (who make the
proposal, where is it discussed).  The
draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process does not mention the
exploratory meeting site.

2. In section 2 "BACKGROUND NOTE:The" missing space.